Understanding the greater diffusion of mobile money innovations in Africa

Abstract

The present research extends Lashitew, van Tulder and Liasse (2019, RP) in order to understand the greater diffusion of mobile money innovations in Africa. To make this assessment, a comparative analysis is engaged between sampled African countries and the corresponding sampled developing countries. Three main types of predictor groups are used for the study, namely: demand, supply and macro-level factors. The empirical evidence is based on Tobit regressions. The tested hypothesis is confirmed because from a comparative analysis between African-specific estimates and those of the sampled countries, not all factors driving mobile money innovations in Africa are apparent in the findings of Lashitew et al. (2019). An extended analysis is also performed to take on board the concern of multicollinearity from which, the best estimators from the study are derived. Comparative findings from correlation analysis show that an African specificity is largely traceable to the 'unique mobile subscription rate' variable. An in-depth empirical analysis further confirms an African specificity in the outcome variables (especially in the mobile used to send/receive money) which, may be traceable to informal sector variables not documented in Lashitew et al. (2019). Scholarly and policy implications are discussed.

The COVID-19 Pandemic and the New Poor in Africa: the Straw that Broke the Camel’s Back

“…Over the past two decades, the world has accomplished interesting results in fighting poverty which has decreased considerably in most developing countries with the exception of Africa where about half of the continent did not attain the millennium development goal target of decreasing extreme poverty by half (Asongu & le Roux, 2019;Tchamyou et al, 2019aTchamyou et al, , 2019bAsongu et al, 2020). Since 1990, the share of the World's population living below the extreme International Poverty Line of US$1.90 per day has largely decreased.…”

The comparative economics of financial access in gender economic inclusion

“…The data is obtained from four principal sources, notably, the: proliferation that are likely to bias the estimation output by producing results with unexpected signs. It is apparent that the correlation between the two financial access proxies which is 0.777 exceeds all documented thresholds for establishing the concern of multicollinearity, notably: (i) 0.500 as suggested by Wichers (1975) andO'brien (2007); (ii) 0.700 by Kennedy (2008) and (ii) an average (or 0.600) of the two contending values as employed by Asongu et al (2020). Consistent with Tchamyou (2019), the underlying concern of multicollinearity is addressed by employing the financial access variables in distinct specifications.…”

Finance, Institutions, and Private Investment in Africa

“…The adopted multicollinearity threshold of .600 is consistent with debates in the literature on multicollinearity thresholds: “an extended analysis is engaged in order to take on board the concern about multicollinearity. A threshold of .600 is used because it is the average of .500 suggested by Wichers (1975) and, .700 posited by Kennedy (2008)” (Asongu, Biekpe, and Cassimon 2020, 5).…”