1991
DOI: 10.2307/2233578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gender gaps in pay have proven to be persistent (Goldin, 1990; Blau & Kahn, 2017), and large in academia. Moreover, the number of women in traditionally higher‐paying academic fields such as economics, science, and engineering has stagnated since 2000 (Ceci et al., 2014; Kahn & Ginther, 2017; Lundberg & Stearns, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender gaps in pay have proven to be persistent (Goldin, 1990; Blau & Kahn, 2017), and large in academia. Moreover, the number of women in traditionally higher‐paying academic fields such as economics, science, and engineering has stagnated since 2000 (Ceci et al., 2014; Kahn & Ginther, 2017; Lundberg & Stearns, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Akerlor and Kranton's study [9] suggests that individuals experience a drop in utility when they deviate from societal expectations, leading to diminished female engagement in the labor field. This model also provides an explanation for occupational segregation based on gender, as supported by Goldin [22], Altonji and Blank [11], and Bertrand et al's findings [23].…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Increasing women's labour force participation, historically and in the last decades, and across societies, has been explained mainly (but not exclusively) by economic changes such as sectoral shifts towards light manufacturing and services, where women have a comparative advantage (in comparison with labour‐intensive agriculture or heavy industry). Attitudinal change (in favour of women's paid employment and other gender equality issues) happened only later on (if at all in the short‐ and medium‐term) (Goldin, 1990; Heath & Jayachandran, 2016; Rindfuss et al., 1996). This is because traditional norms, including gender ideologies, tend be rather ‘sticky’ and durable.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%