Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities

Abstract

A major challenge for managers in turbulent environments is to make sound decisions quickly. Dynamic capabilities have been proposed as a means for addressing turbulent environments by helping managers extend, modify, and reconfigure existing operational capabilities into new ones that better match the environment. However, because dynamic capabilities have been viewed as an elusive black box, it is difficult for managers to make sound decisions in turbulent environments if they cannot effectively measure dynamic capabilities. Therefore, we first seek to propose a measurable model of dynamic capabilities by conceptualizing, operationalizing, and measuring dynamic capabilities. Specifically, drawing upon the dynamic capabilities literature, we identify a set of capabilities-sensing the environment, learning, coordinating, and integratingthat help reconfigure existing operational capabilities into new ones that better match the environment. Second, we propose a structural model where dynamic capabilities influence performance by reconfiguring existing operational capabilities in the context of new product development (NPD). Data from 180 NPD units support both the measurable model of dynamic capabilities and also the structural model by which dynamic capabilities influence performance in NPD by reconfiguring operational capabilities, particularly in higher levels of environmental turbulence. The study's implications for managerial decision making in turbulent environments by capturing the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities are discussed.

Heterogeneity in dynamic capability configurations: Equifinality and strategic performance

“…In turn, business model sensing promotes strategic change, because "a plethora of business models … can be designed and employed, but some will be better adapted to the ecosystem then others" (Teece, 2007(Teece, , p. 1330. Firms with high awareness of their own and competitors' business models are in a better position to identify new business models that fit the ecosystem, such that these firms can better seize new opportunities and strategically reconfigure their business than companies with low awareness (Pavlou & El Sawy, 2011).…”

Higher education and economic development: The importance of building technological capabilities

“…Von Tunzelmann and Wang (2007) refer to such capabilities as "dynamic interactive capabilities" in order to distinguish the interactive capabilities necessary for routine activities and those interactive capabilities supporting greater flexibility in responding to dynamic changes in circumstance. Pavlou and El Sawy (2011) identify four dynamic capabilities: sensing, learning, integrating and coordinating.…”

The effect of leverage factors of learning to product quality of wooden house industry at Woloan District, North Sulawesi, Indonesia

“…The questionnaire of learning is divided into four groups, namely knowledge acquisition (Acqs), knowledge assimilation (Assm), knowledge transformation (Trfm), and knowledge exploitation (Expl) (Pavlou and Sawy, 2011), and took responses from the owner of the firms, while the measurement of quality is based on the eight dimensions of quality proposed by Garvin (McLeod, 2005), namely performance, feature, reliability, conformance, durability, serviceability, aesthetic and perceived quality asked to the customers. The 52-item survey about Learning Organization was administrated to all of the 38 firms in wooden house industry and 36-item survey about quality was randomly administrated to 38 customers of wooden house, representing a number of wooden house's buyers.…”