2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the effects of professors' pedagogical development with Clicker Assessment and Feedback technologies and the impact on students' engagement and learning in higher education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
95
1
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
7
95
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was consistent with a study similar to E-slide Feedback technology but with clickers technology [7],which suggested that students can effectively multi-task, i.e. provide feedback while they are learning concepts delivered by the educator.…”
Section: Improving Student Attentivenesssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This result was consistent with a study similar to E-slide Feedback technology but with clickers technology [7],which suggested that students can effectively multi-task, i.e. provide feedback while they are learning concepts delivered by the educator.…”
Section: Improving Student Attentivenesssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The reason for this phenomenon may be explained by the fact that formative assessment greatly improves students' satisfaction with a course [38]. Our survey was designed to cover the most frequently used scales in CRS literature [45]: learning and understanding. Students positively viewed the incorporation of i-SIDRA into lectures (Q1, mean, 4.1).…”
Section: Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Además, éstos implican el uso de presentaciones interactivas altamente atractivas y Smartphone/Computadora/Tablet para ejercer dicha interacción alumno-contenido en tiempo real (Caldwell, 2007). Asimismo, el uso de clickers genera retroalimentación (feedback) a los alumnos facilitando la adquisición de competencias y mejorando el rendimiento académico posterior (Han & Finkelstein, 2013). El feedback generado mediante el uso de nuevas tecnologías podría llegar a ser más efectivo que la retroalimentación generada por procesos de autoevaluación basados en tests escritos o respondidos electrónicamente mediante plataformas de ayuda a la docencia.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified