2020
DOI: 10.5194/hess-24-1145-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the effects of climate warming on streamflow and active groundwater storage in an alpine catchment: the upper Lhasa River

Abstract: Abstract. Climate warming is changing streamflow regimes and groundwater storage in cold alpine regions. In this study, the Yangbajain headwater catchment in the Lhasa River basin is adopted as the study area to assess streamflow changes and active groundwater storage in response to climate warming. The results show that both annual streamflow and the mean air temperature increase significantly at respective rates of about 12.30 mm per decade and 0.28 ∘C per decade from 1979 to 2013 in the study area. The resu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that the permafrost loss in the past decades has enhanced regional groundwater circulation (shortening its timescale) with more discharge to stream flows (Ji et al, 2020;Walvoord et al, 2012). As an example, the baseflow in the source region of the Yangtze River increased at a rate of 1.35 mm a −1 during 1962-2012, following the annual temperature rise of 1.32 • C (Yi et al, 2021) and 1.09 mm a −1 during 1979-2013 in glacierized basins in the TP, with its annual temperature rise of 0.98 • C (Lin et al, 2020). Walvoord and Striegl (2007) found that the groundwater contribution to streamflow in an arctic basin increased by 0.7 %-0.9 % per year from the 1950s to 2005, following its annual temperature rise of 1.24 • C during that period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that the permafrost loss in the past decades has enhanced regional groundwater circulation (shortening its timescale) with more discharge to stream flows (Ji et al, 2020;Walvoord et al, 2012). As an example, the baseflow in the source region of the Yangtze River increased at a rate of 1.35 mm a −1 during 1962-2012, following the annual temperature rise of 1.32 • C (Yi et al, 2021) and 1.09 mm a −1 during 1979-2013 in glacierized basins in the TP, with its annual temperature rise of 0.98 • C (Lin et al, 2020). Walvoord and Striegl (2007) found that the groundwater contribution to streamflow in an arctic basin increased by 0.7 %-0.9 % per year from the 1950s to 2005, following its annual temperature rise of 1.24 • C during that period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modeling uncertainty is highly related to the model structure and parameters, and our results indicated that the additional information from the isotope data reduced the uncertainty of the parameters. However, global climate changes are changing streamflow regimes on the TP (e.g., M. Lin et al, 2020;Yong et al, 2021), which may re-quest a changing model structure as well. In this study, the model structure was not modified; thus, the changing conditions were far less than adequately represented in the current model, due to lack of adequate understanding of the influence of changing conditions on the runoff generation mechanism.…”
Section: Uncertainties and Limitations Of The Tracer-aided Hydrological Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As examples, the baseflow in the source region of the Yangtze River increased at a rate of 1.35 mm•a −1 during 1962-2012 following the annual temperature rise of ~1.32 ℃ (Yi et al, 2021), and 1.09 mm•a −1 during 1979-2013 in another glacierized basin of YBJ (Fig. 1), also in the Yangtze River with its annual temperature rise of ~0.98 ℃ (Lin et al, 2020). Walvoord and Striegl (2007) found that the groundwater contribution to streamflow in an arctic basin increased by 0.7-0.9% per year from the 1950s to 2005 following its annual temperature rise of ~1.24 ℃ during that period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%