Understanding the effectiveness of Capability Maturity Model Integration by examining the knowledge management of software development processes

Shang, Shari S. C.; Lin, Shu-Fang

doi:10.1080/14783360902863671

Cited by 20 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Researchers continue to define new objectives and processes to assist assure the system's robustness even though the CMMI-DEV has already addressed many of these problems. The "Process and Practice Working Group" page may be found on the Software Assurance Society Tools and Data Clearinghouse website [11]. The SEI website has further information about the CMMI.…”

Section: The Development Of Stp-aware Softwarementioning

confidence: 99%

A Capability Maturity Model for STP aware Software Development

Sllian

Mazur

2022

JMC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There has been an increase in the importance of software Security, Trust, and Privacy (STP). Product systems must be designed with trustworthy STP protection methods while still rendering the required benefits of applications to its consumers. As a result of this large skill gap, colleges and the software sector have found themselves in a state of supply- and-demand conflict. STP-aware software development requires a new practice Capability Maturity Model (CMM) to address this issue. In order to help colleges progressively increase their students' capacity to apply what they have learned in the classroom, this contribution provides a model that consists of 4 levels: Awareness, Curriculum, Project, and Enterprise, for STP-aware software development. Software development that is STP-aware has been shown to be quite beneficial in the development of programming talent's practice capabilities for learners.

show abstract

Section: The Development Of Stp-aware Softwarementioning

confidence: 99%

A Capability Maturity Model for STP aware Software Development

Sllian

Mazur

2022

JMC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The most common maturity stages (i.e., initial, repeatable, defined, managed, optimizing) known from CMMI relate to the maturity of business processes, so they do not fit our purposes (Chrissis et al 2011). CMMI focuses on improving the speed, cost, and quality of software development processes based on improvement actions per capability area to be implemented along the maturation path (Shang and Lin 2009). However, the OAMM deals with capability development on the organizational level.…”

Section: Assignment Of Actionable Practices To Maturity Stagesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Building an ambidextrous organization: a maturity model for organizational ambidexterity

Stelzl

Röglinger

Wyrtki

2020

Bus Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Organizational ambidexterity (OA) is an essential capability for organizations in turbulent environments, as it facilitates the simultaneous pursuit of exploitation and exploration. Over the last years, knowledge on OA has continuously matured, covering outcomes, moderators, and types of OA. However, little is known about how to build an ambidextrous organization in terms of what capabilities are needed and how they can be developed. To address this gap, we developed an organizational ambidexterity maturity model (OAMM) that assists organizations in becoming ambidextrous based on actionable practices (APs) structured according to five capability areas. In developing the OAMM, we conducted a structured literature review to compile APs and used card sorting to assign APs to maturity stages. We evaluated the OAMM based on literature-backed design objectives and discussions with practitioners. We also conducted an initial empirical validation of the APs' assignment to maturity stages. The OAMM extends the descriptive and prescriptive knowledge on OA by taking a holistic view on OA, by shedding light on the interrelation of different OA types, and by enabling the assessment of an organization's as-is and to-be OA maturity based on implemented APs.

show abstract

“…However, authors have not been able to comment on last two layers of proposed framework; the Tools Layer, and The Leadership Layer. In [14] authors have empirically examined and identified channel, message, context, recipient and source are the key factors that can influence knowledge transfer in virtual information system development (ISD) teams. On the basis of these five factors 4C (Capability, Creditability, Communication volume, and Culture,) framework of knowledge transfer has been proposed.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

The role of knowledge management in global software engineering

Khalid

Shehryar

Arshad

2015

2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Knowledge management (KM) is essential ingredient of successful coordination in globally distributed software engineering. Various frameworks and KMSs have been proposed to foster coordination and communication between virtual teams but practical implementation of these solutions has not been found. Organizations have to face challenges to implement KMS. For this purpose a literature review has arranged to investigate about challenges that restrict organizations to implement KMS and then by keep in account these challenges the need of integrated solution in the form of standardized KMS that can easily store tacit and explicit knowledge, has found to facilitate coordination among virtual teams. Literature review has been already shown that knowledge is a complex perception with profound meanings, and one of the most important resources that contributes to the competitive advantage. In order to meet different challenges caused by not properly managing knowledge related to projects among virtual teams, we suggest making use of the cloud computing model. In this research a distributed architecture to support KM storage, conceptual framework of KM as a service in cloud has proposed. Framework presented in [33] is enhanced and conceptual framework of KM has embedded into that framework to store projects related knowledge for future use.

show abstract

Understanding the effectiveness of Capability Maturity Model Integration by examining the knowledge management of software development processes

Cited by 20 publications

References 15 publications

A Capability Maturity Model for STP aware Software Development

A Capability Maturity Model for STP aware Software Development

Building an ambidextrous organization: a maturity model for organizational ambidexterity

The role of knowledge management in global software engineering

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About