Understanding the Effect of Security Assistance on Human Rights: The Case of Plan Colombia

Abstract

Existing large-N research argues that governments that rely on their citizens for their revenue are more accountable to their citizens and thus have more incentives to protect human rights. This argument predicts that other sources of revenue fail to provide such incentives. Due to this, governments that rely on alternative sources of revenue will experience poor human rights conditions. This article is aimed at exploring this expectation by looking at one particular type of alternative source of revenue: security assistance. According to the argument, security assistance should negatively impact human rights conditions due to its effect on governments' efforts to protect and respect human rights. This article uses the case of Plan Colombia to assess this argument. By looking at the way in which foreign assistance interacts with domestic institutions, the case suggest that the negative effect is caused by the erosion on checks and balances and, most importantly, by changes in civil-military relations.

Del gobierno electrónico al big data: la digitalización de la gestión pública en Colombia frente al control territorial

“…Como bien lo explican Gutiérrez y Barón (2006), la desmovilización de las fuerzas paramilitares representó un primer paso para la reconstrucción de la estatalidad en la década del 2000. A esto hay que añadir que el Plan Colombia ayudó también a fortalecer la lucha contra las insurgencias (Fajardo-Heyward, 2015), facilitando entonces esa paulatina recuperación del territorio. Teniendo en cuenta la progresión de las décadas del 2000 y 2010 explicada ya en diferentes textos académicos (como Dávila, Salazar Arbeláez y González-Chavarría, 2016), se puede sugerir que la progresión de la relación Estado-ciudadanía ha reposado efectivamente sobre el proceso de territorialización clásico y digital.…”

From Continuity to Breakthrough: the Obama Administration’s Policy in Latin America

“…a specialist in latin american issues, michael shifter, wrote: "no one could have predicted that honduras, the third-poorest country in the Western hemisphere, would test the obama administration's posture toward latin america, its commitment to multilateralism, and its overarching policy on democracy." 18 This statement is true but with one reservation -the crisis in Honduras had been developing for some time and the situation in which a us intervention would be necessary was to be predicted. on June 28, 2009, the president of the country, Manuel Zelaya, was removed from office by the military and forced to leave honduras.…”