2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the drug resistance mechanism of hepatitis C virus NS3/4A to ITMN-191 due to R155K, A156V, D168A/E mutations: A computational study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MD simulations here provided additional insights also into the mechanism of resistance due to R155K mutation, which was previously revealed from crystal structures (Romano, Ali et al 2010, Romano, Ali et al 2012). The destabilization of danoprevir's P2 isoindoline in the presence of R155K both in the crystal structures and MD simulations is consistent with earlier simulation results of Pan et al (Pan, Xue et al 2012), indicating that the severe destabilization of P2 is not a crystallization or force-field dependent artifact. In fact, the P2 moiety samples diverse conformations distinct from the one observed in the crystal structure (Figure 3), with substantial losses in vdW interactions with the active site protease residues.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The MD simulations here provided additional insights also into the mechanism of resistance due to R155K mutation, which was previously revealed from crystal structures (Romano, Ali et al 2010, Romano, Ali et al 2012). The destabilization of danoprevir's P2 isoindoline in the presence of R155K both in the crystal structures and MD simulations is consistent with earlier simulation results of Pan et al (Pan, Xue et al 2012), indicating that the severe destabilization of P2 is not a crystallization or force-field dependent artifact. In fact, the P2 moiety samples diverse conformations distinct from the one observed in the crystal structure (Figure 3), with substantial losses in vdW interactions with the active site protease residues.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As a result, the altered charge distribution along the binding surface affects the P2 cyclopentylproline and P4 cyclohexylalanine moieties of telaprevir whereas danoprevir loses a favorable cation-π interaction at the P2 isoindoline (Romano, Ali et al 2012). MD simulations based on these crystal structures suggest that the destruction of the salt bridge between 168 and 155 may cause additional conformational changes in the binding pocket (Pan, Xue et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These results are in agreement with other previous in vitro resistance studies and clinical observations. For example, R155 in GT 1a virus and D168 in GT 1b virus, conferring cross-resistance to other macrocyclic PIs, are also commonly seen in patients treated with vaniprevir, danoprevir, BI 201335, and TMC-435 (7,12,15,26). Clinical studies with telaprevir identified V36A/M, T54A, R155T/K, and A156S/V/T mutations in NS3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that earlier studies for HCV protease were not able to reproduce the experimental observations even in a qualitative agreement. 18,19 In these studies, the popular molecular mechanics PB surface area (MM/PBSA) model and the related molecular mechanics-generalized Born surface area (MM/GBSA) were used. These models are apparently an inconsistent adaptation of the earlier PDLD/S-LRA idea of MD generated configurations for implicit solvent calculations, calculating the average over the configurations generated with the charged solute alone.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%