2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2018.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the drivers for Natura 2000 payments in forests: A Heckman selection analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are issues with the inefficient use of subsidies from the EU and insufficient control of nature protection by the central EU authorities [42], including problems with the non-functional compensation mechanism for private forests included in the Natura 2000 network [43]. According to Křenová and Kindlmann [42], the negative effects on Natura 2000 habitats and species are stronger in the states with the weak position of the state representatives, such as the Czech Republic or, more generally, Eastern European countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are issues with the inefficient use of subsidies from the EU and insufficient control of nature protection by the central EU authorities [42], including problems with the non-functional compensation mechanism for private forests included in the Natura 2000 network [43]. According to Křenová and Kindlmann [42], the negative effects on Natura 2000 habitats and species are stronger in the states with the weak position of the state representatives, such as the Czech Republic or, more generally, Eastern European countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest owners and managers need financial incentives to provide ecosystem services by protecting and restoring the forests, and to increase the resilience of the forests by managing them in the most climate-and biodiversity-friendly way, which can be achieved by limiting timber harvesting, among other methods. Sarvašová et al [43,44] noted that the countries with the highest proportion of forest areas in the Natura 2000 protected areas receive the lowest compensation and that policy implementation is obviously not geared to the needs of private forests (if one takes the proportion of private forests in the country as a basis). WTA values indicate different expectations depending on the level of timber harvesting restrictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Probit model was used in Model 1 [42] to conduct an empirical analysis of the influencing factors of whether the residents in the upper reaches of the Ganjiang River Basin had the willingness to accept compensation. The detailed formula is as follows:…”
Section: Heckman Two-stage Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%