2003
DOI: 10.1056/nejmsb022365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Divergent Data on Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

11
167
2
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 304 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(13 reference statements)
11
167
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the potent activity of exogenous estrogens in experimental models is paralleled by controversial results in humans ( [210,209]). Secondary analyses of recent randomized clinical trials, that originally raised controversies among the scientific community as to the risk/benefit ratio of HT ( [85,159,237]), helped to consolidate a novel hypothesis on the efficacy of hormone therapy [200]; it is now hypothesized that HT should be started in early menopause, as a preventative treatment of relatively healthy women, in order to avoid the negative consequences of hypoestrogenicity per se [92]. In fact, observational and randomized clinical trials show that HT does not improve memory or intellectual functions in women already affected by mild to moderate AD ( [70,172,199]), whereas it delays disease onset when administered in healthy perimenopausal women ( [100,117,200,228]).…”
Section: The Timing Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the potent activity of exogenous estrogens in experimental models is paralleled by controversial results in humans ( [210,209]). Secondary analyses of recent randomized clinical trials, that originally raised controversies among the scientific community as to the risk/benefit ratio of HT ( [85,159,237]), helped to consolidate a novel hypothesis on the efficacy of hormone therapy [200]; it is now hypothesized that HT should be started in early menopause, as a preventative treatment of relatively healthy women, in order to avoid the negative consequences of hypoestrogenicity per se [92]. In fact, observational and randomized clinical trials show that HT does not improve memory or intellectual functions in women already affected by mild to moderate AD ( [70,172,199]), whereas it delays disease onset when administered in healthy perimenopausal women ( [100,117,200,228]).…”
Section: The Timing Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In examining outcomes among women who received hormone replacement therapy (HRT), although observational studies did not yield similar results in the area of coronary heart disease, the two types of studies yielded almost identical point estimates in the areas of risk for breast and colorectal cancer, hip fracture, stroke, and pulmonary embolism (6). Grodstein et al (6) systematically reviewed these studies and suggested that methodologic differences may have explained why discrepancies were noted for certain outcomes and not for others. For example, observational data supporting the use of HRT primarily examined women who initiated therapy at the time of menopause, whereas approximately 70% of women in the Women's Health Initiative (RCT examining HRT and outcomes) were enrolled at the 60 yr or older.…”
Section: Selection Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T here has been recent interest in reconciling findings from observational studies and randomized clinical trials (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). The field of nephrology relies heavily on observational studies, most notably from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) and large providers of treatment for patients with ESRD (9,10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%