Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2022
DOI: 10.1145/3512290.3528689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the cost of fitness evaluation for subset selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, when simulations are used for AST, computational time and cost can be a serious problem [15], [23], [13], [10], [21]. In fact, the problem of fitness function evaluation cost, where "cost" may refer to computational cost, energy cost, engineering cost, or other costs, is a more general problem in AI [27], [9], [14], [20], [22]. Second, failure events other than collisions are of great interest.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, when simulations are used for AST, computational time and cost can be a serious problem [15], [23], [13], [10], [21]. In fact, the problem of fitness function evaluation cost, where "cost" may refer to computational cost, energy cost, engineering cost, or other costs, is a more general problem in AI [27], [9], [14], [20], [22]. Second, failure events other than collisions are of great interest.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the results from the study and the feedback from the inspectors, it is likely that doing so could further increase inspection performance. The dataset used for the prototype does not have many features, so adding more features and using feature selection could be an option to optimize performance [13,26,24,25]. Another direction for future work is to take advantage of the transparency of the CBCBR method, and develop more explanation methods to promote and increase the inspectors' trust in the system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%