Understanding the complexity of population health interventions: assessing intervention system theory (ISyT)

Abstract

Given their inherent complexity, we need a better understanding of what is happening inside the “black box” of population health interventions. The theory-driven intervention/evaluation paradigm is one approach to addressing this question. However, barriers related to semantic or practical issues stand in the way of its complete integration into evaluation designs. In this paper, we attempt to clarify how various theories, models and frameworks can contribute to developing a context-dependent theory, helping us to understand the black box of population health interventions and to acknowledge their complexity. To achieve this goal, we clarify what could be referred to as “theory” in the theory-driven evaluation of the interventional system, distinguishing it from other models, frameworks and classical theories. In order to evaluate the interventional system with a theory-driven paradigm, we put forward the concept of interventional system theory (ISyT), which combines a causal theory and an action model. We suggest that an ISyT could guide evaluation processes, whatever evaluation design is applied, and illustrate this alternative method through different examples of studies. We believe that such a clarification can help to promote the use of theories in complex intervention evaluations, and to identify ways of considering the transferability and scalability of interventions.

‘Writing budgets for meetings and teas?’: a multitheoretical analysis of intragovernmental coordination for multisectoral action for health in Uganda

“…For example, the usual approach of dividing coordination context into legal, political, economic and social dimensions exemplifies a thematical categorisation for descriptive purposes, an entirely different thing from a theoretical approach. 88 A (multi)theoretical approach permits a more profound and multifaceted analysis of complex phenomena. For example, the TCE considers the intragovernmental coordination a constellation of exchanges between the MDAs within and across levels and policy areas (each with interests above and beyond their institutional mandate).…”

Conditions for the success and the feasibility of health mediation for healthcare use by underserved populations: a scoping review

“…Health mediation thus corresponds to a complex health intervention 47 because of its contextual anchoring. 48 Indeed, health mediation practices are multifaceted 49 50 even though a joint intervention base exists. Health mediation has blurred boundaries in the healthcare system, torn between the community approach and the universalist paradigm, the biomedical and the social worlds.…”

“…This review underlines several characteristics of health mediation that articulate education and healthcare system navigation actions, along with actions of mobilisation, engagement, and collaboration of local actors among themselves and with the populations. Health mediation thus corresponds to a complex health intervention47 because of its contextual anchoring 48. Indeed, health mediation practices are multifaceted49 50 even though a joint intervention base exists.…”

Evaluation proposal of a national community-based obesity prevention programme: a novel approach considering the complexity perspective

“…The principles for effectiveness form a set of hypothesis that can be validated in the second phase of the study. Principles should eventually provide simple and pragmatic guidance for action [66] for effective communitybased obesity prevention across contexts [29]. This means identifying those (combinations of ) programme components that underly significant and/or structural impact in communities, for example because they set into motion a reinforcing feedback loop.…”