2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3878(00)00102-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the behavior of bank spreads in Latin America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
203
1
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(244 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
28
203
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This can reduce the deposit cost of the well-thriven banks leading to higher profit margins. This result is in accordance with that of other studies, namely Demirguc-Kunt and Huizinga, (1999); Ben Naceur, (2003); Kosmidou and Pasiouras, (2005); Valverde and Fernandez, (2007); Brock and Suarez, (2000); Demirguç-Kunt, Loeven and Levine, (2004) ; and Saunders and Schumacher (2000).…”
Section: H2: Credit Risk Has a Positive Impact On Bank Profitabilitysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This can reduce the deposit cost of the well-thriven banks leading to higher profit margins. This result is in accordance with that of other studies, namely Demirguc-Kunt and Huizinga, (1999); Ben Naceur, (2003); Kosmidou and Pasiouras, (2005); Valverde and Fernandez, (2007); Brock and Suarez, (2000); Demirguç-Kunt, Loeven and Levine, (2004) ; and Saunders and Schumacher (2000).…”
Section: H2: Credit Risk Has a Positive Impact On Bank Profitabilitysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This latter finding is tentatively explained by the authors as a result of inadequate provisioning for loan losses: higher non-performing loans would reduce banks´ income, thereby lowering the spread in the absence of loan loss reserves. This study by Brock & Rojas-Suarez (2000) also found a tendency, nonetheless weak, for higher output growth rates to lower the spread, which the authors claim that may reflect the fact that high growth generally raises the capitalized value of firms and reduces the cost of lending by lowering default risk.…”
Section: Structure Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…According to the study conducted by Demirgüç-Kunt & Huizinga (1999), using bank-level data for 80 countries in the years 1988-95, output growth does not seem to have any impact on bank spread, though. In turn, Brock & Rojas-Suarez (2000) studied the determinants of banking spreads in six Latin American countries during the mid-1990s and found a more mixed evidence, with higher levels of non-performing loans having raised spreads in some countries, but having lowered them in others. This latter finding is tentatively explained by the authors as a result of inadequate provisioning for loan losses: higher non-performing loans would reduce banks´ income, thereby lowering the spread in the absence of loan loss reserves.…”
Section: Structure Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we consider as control variables the inflation rate (Perry, 1992), the growth rate of GDP per capita (Ben Naceur & Goaied, 2008), the reserve requirements (Brock & Rojas Suárez, 2000;, and the economic crises (De la Torre, Ize, & Schmukler, 2012).…”
Section: Extra-bank Determinantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the limitations of the current literature on Latin America are rooted in either the scope and/or the scale of their analyses. For instance, although they use samples for several countries, they study the banking profitability using bank-specific data only (Brock & Rojas Suárez, 2000) or their samples of firms suffer from lack of representativeness in order to carry out further extrapolation (Gelos, 2009). Additionally, most of this already rather scarce empirical literature is focused on the analysis of individual countries such as Colombia (Barajas, Steiner, & Salazar, 1999), Chile (Brock & Franken, 2003), Argentina (Catão, 1998), or Brazil (Afanasieff, Lhacer, & Kanane, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%