2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2014.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the adoption of location-based recommendation agents among active users of social networking sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Information systems theories such as the technology acceptance model are often used as the theoretical bases. Zhu et al (2014) found that perceived usefulness is an important factor affecting SNS user adoption of location-based recommendation agents. Jin (2013) noted that perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness and perceived playfulness affect a user's intention to continue using Facebook.…”
Section: Research Model and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information systems theories such as the technology acceptance model are often used as the theoretical bases. Zhu et al (2014) found that perceived usefulness is an important factor affecting SNS user adoption of location-based recommendation agents. Jin (2013) noted that perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness and perceived playfulness affect a user's intention to continue using Facebook.…”
Section: Research Model and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initiators or consultants implementing the LARSMA system or other similar systems should emphasize the gap in the flow of advertising services between advertisers and consumers and the importance of using geographical data. Initiators or consultants explain that the employed LARSMA with a mechanism of recommending advertising messages can help target mobile consumers by considering their location and personal preferences with an acceptable privacy risk (Zhu et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By studying the previous recommendation algorithms about the similarity calculation of the friends and the target user, most of them [15,16,21,22] just simply compute a direct similarity based on Pearson correlation coefficient, and there is no distinction between direct similarity and indirect similarity. Wang et al [19] find out that lots of mentioned video recommendation algorithms ignore the attributes of recommendation so that the accuracy of the recommendation results are not very satisfactory.…”
Section: The Proposed Computing Methods Of Similarity Between Usersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By studying the previous recommendation algorithms about the similarity calculation of the friends and the target user, most of them just simply compute a direct similarity based on Pearson correlation coefficient, and there is no distinction between direct similarity and indirect similarity. Wang et al .…”
Section: The Trust Friends Computing Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%