2019
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Test Takers' Choices in a Self-Adapted Test: A Hidden Markov Modeling of Process Data

Abstract: With the rise of more interactive assessments, such as simulation- and game-based assessment, process data are available to learn about students' cognitive processes as well as motivational aspects. Since process data can be complicated due to interdependencies in time, our traditional psychometric models may not necessarily fit, and we need to look for additional ways to analyze such data. In this study, we draw process data from a study on self-adapted test under different goal conditions (Arieli-Attali, 201… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Last but not least, the statistical model simultaneously represents both between-and within-subject qualitative and quantitative variability that is prevalent in students' learning processes. It extends many traditional models, including finite mixture models [8,9], hidden Markov models [5,20], and regime-switching dynamic models [7,14], to enable crucial inferences of students' learning processes to inform interventions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last but not least, the statistical model simultaneously represents both between-and within-subject qualitative and quantitative variability that is prevalent in students' learning processes. It extends many traditional models, including finite mixture models [8,9], hidden Markov models [5,20], and regime-switching dynamic models [7,14], to enable crucial inferences of students' learning processes to inform interventions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sort of data contained in log files, referred to as process data in this paper, provides information beyond response data that typically show correctness or incorrectness only. This additional information holds promise to help us understand the strategies that underlie proficient performance and identify key actions that lead to success or failure (e.g., Arieli‐Attali et al, 2019; Han et al, 2019; He & von Davier, 2015, 2016; Liao et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, HMMs have extensively been used to model the behavior of individual students regarding their engagement and their motivation towards the learning procedure [2,10,18,50,54,62]. Arieli-Attali et al [1] used a HMM to learn about test takers' choice-making behavior in a self-adapted test, Shih et al [52] proposed a HMM that could discover student learning tactics, Tadayon and Pottie [59] and He and Gao [19] used a HMM to analyze and make predictions of the students' performance in educational games, and Jeong et al [25] used HMMs to examine the effect of metacognitive prompting on students' learning in the context of our computer-based learning-by-teaching environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%