2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding sustainable accessibility in urban planning: Themes of consensus, themes of tension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meiyappan et al, 2014) would allow for heterogeneous population downscaling, and also for more realistic spatial allocation of facilities. This would facilitate comparative analyses of the impacts of greenfield development versus urban densification and infill on accessibility equity (Quiros et al, 2015;Sola et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meiyappan et al, 2014) would allow for heterogeneous population downscaling, and also for more realistic spatial allocation of facilities. This would facilitate comparative analyses of the impacts of greenfield development versus urban densification and infill on accessibility equity (Quiros et al, 2015;Sola et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A brief methodological description follows. For a more detailed description, see Gil Solá et al [26].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to note that the different understandings of proximity were crystallized from workshop discussions on the concept of sustainable accessibility, not the proximity concept as such. However, proximity was understood as central to the concept of sustainable accessibility by both the planners and the researchers [26].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations