2012
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding specialism when the jack of all trades can be the master of all

Abstract: Specialism is widespread in nature, generating and maintaining diversity, but recent work has demonstrated that generalists can be equally fit as specialists in some shared environments. This no-cost generalism challenges the maxim that 'the jack of all trades is the master of none', and requires evolutionary genetic mechanisms explaining the existence of specialism and no-cost generalism, and the persistence of specialism in the face of selection for generalism. Examining three well-described mechanisms with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
189
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
7
189
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Not all potential hosts in the host range (different species or different genotypes of the same species) of a virus are equally susceptible to infection, and it is generally assumed that a tight match may exist between host genotypes and virus genotypes to allow a virus to successfully infect a host (6). Indeed, a substantial amount of data supports the idea that by evolving in a single host species or genotype, viruses become specialists (7)(8)(9)(10), whereas by evolving in multiple host species, the result may be no-cost generalists (7,(11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Importancementioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Not all potential hosts in the host range (different species or different genotypes of the same species) of a virus are equally susceptible to infection, and it is generally assumed that a tight match may exist between host genotypes and virus genotypes to allow a virus to successfully infect a host (6). Indeed, a substantial amount of data supports the idea that by evolving in a single host species or genotype, viruses become specialists (7)(8)(9)(10), whereas by evolving in multiple host species, the result may be no-cost generalists (7,(11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Importancementioning
confidence: 77%
“…Indeed, it has been postulated that pleiotropy is a prerequisite for epistasis (3,40). This dependence is obvious for the case of sign pleiotropy, where mutations with a positive effect in the new host have a negative effect in the primary one (13). Furthermore, in the context of compensatory evolution, antagonistic pleiotropy is a precondition for sign epistasis because it allows for the negative pleiotropic effects of previously selected mutations to be compensated by additional ones (3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in shaken microcosms that preclude mat formation, WS genotypes cannot invade populations of the SM ancestor from rare (40). These observations show that SM and WS genotypes occupy different niches and coexist due to frequency-dependent fitness interactions and tradeoffs (10,22,34). Coexistence among WS genotypes has also been shown to be stabilized by negative frequency-dependent fitness interactions, indicating differences between their niches (41).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Founder evolvability places an upper limit on the number of organisms with different niches that can emerge by adaptive radiation over an interval of evolutionary time. Moreover, for adaptive radiation to occur, founder evolvability must facilitate generation of diverse niche specialists but preclude "Darwinian demons" with superior, generalist niches that would impede adaptive radiation (10,34). Studies on extant adaptive radiations have begun to probe the impact of evolvability (16,35,36), and its importance for diversification in general is supported by evidence from experimental evolution (e.g., refs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…By definition, on any given resource axis, the distribution of the absolute fitness of specialist species is narrow, while generalists have an equal fitness across the axis [1]. It has classically been proposed that 'the jack of all trades is the master of none' [2], which suggests that generalists bear a cost that will reduce their fitness relative to a specialist using the same resource.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%