2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Sexual Activity and Chlamydia Testing Rate Based on Linked National Survey and Medicaid Claims Data

Abstract: BackgroundMonitoring adherence to national recommendations for annual chlamydia screening of female adolescents and young adult women is important for targeting quality improvement interventions to improve low screening rates. However, accurate measurement of rates may vary depending on the data source used to determine eligible sexually-active women.MethodsThe 2001–2004 NHANES data linked with Medicaid administrative data by respondent’s unique identifier, the 2011–2012 NHANES data, and the 2004 and 2010 Medi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, we may have overestimated chlamydia testing rates among those sexually active if we underestimated the percentage of women who are sexually active. 24,25 For example, women might be sexually active without seeking medical care for sexual health–related services. However, the percentage of women we classified as being sexually active is consistent with the percentages identified by the 2006–2008 National Survey of Family Growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we may have overestimated chlamydia testing rates among those sexually active if we underestimated the percentage of women who are sexually active. 24,25 For example, women might be sexually active without seeking medical care for sexual health–related services. However, the percentage of women we classified as being sexually active is consistent with the percentages identified by the 2006–2008 National Survey of Family Growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%