2014
DOI: 10.2298/vsp1411062s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding sensitivity, specificity and predictive values

Abstract: Key words: data interpretation, statistical; sensitivity and specificity; predictive value of tests.Klju ne re i: statisti ka analiza podataka; osetljivost i specifi nost; testovi, prognosti ka vrednost.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is valuable for the classifications because it is preferable to inaccurately assume an urge is present (and risk unnecessary urge query) than miss a real urge (and risk not intervening to prevent smoking). In addition, sensitivity and specificity are inversely proportional [47,48]. That can also explain why the specificity is low: as the sensitivity increases, the specificity decreases and vice versa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is valuable for the classifications because it is preferable to inaccurately assume an urge is present (and risk unnecessary urge query) than miss a real urge (and risk not intervening to prevent smoking). In addition, sensitivity and specificity are inversely proportional [47,48]. That can also explain why the specificity is low: as the sensitivity increases, the specificity decreases and vice versa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard analyses of the CABS sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were conducted to evaluate the instrument's potential utility as a screening tool (Katz, ; Stojanovic et al, ; Table ). Estimates of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to assess the predictive performance of the CABS instrument, after collapsing CABS scores into two categories: bullied and not bullied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construct validity of the CABS screen was evaluated using the known-groups method (Burns & Grove, 2009). Mean CABS scores for subjects classified as having and not having experienced bullying based on the CBVS and the R- Standard analyses of the CABS sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were conducted to evaluate the instrument's potential utility as a screening tool (Katz, 2006;Stojanovic et al, 2014; Table 2). Estimates of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to assess the predictive performance of the CABS instrument, after collapsing CABS scores into two categories: bullied and not bullied.…”
Section: Instrument Functioning In Comparison To Existing Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations