The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Proceedings of the 2011 International Workshop on DETecting and Exploiting Cultural diversiTy on the Social Web 2011
DOI: 10.1145/2064448.2064475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding semantic change of words over centuries

Abstract: In this paper, we propose to model and analyze changes that occur to an entity in terms of changes in the words that co-occur with the entity over time. We propose to do an in-depth analysis of how this co-occurrence changes over time, how the change influences the state (semantic, role) of the entity, and how the change may correspond to events occurring in the same period of time. We propose to identify clusters of topics surrounding the entity over time using Topics-Over-Time (TOT) and k-means clustering. W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that for cell, the identified period of change ) coincides with the introduction-and subsequent adoption-of the cell phone by the general public. 3 Likewise, the period of change for gay agrees with the gay movement which began around the 1970s (Wijaya and Yeniterzi, 2011).…”
Section: Periods Of Changementioning
confidence: 53%
“…We note that for cell, the identified period of change ) coincides with the introduction-and subsequent adoption-of the cell phone by the general public. 3 Likewise, the period of change for gay agrees with the gay movement which began around the 1970s (Wijaya and Yeniterzi, 2011).…”
Section: Periods Of Changementioning
confidence: 53%
“…Topic-based models (where topics are interpreted as senses) have been used to detect novel senses in one collection compared to another by identifying new topics in the later corpus ((Lau et al, 2012;Cook et al, 2014)), or to cluster top- ics over time (Wijaya and Yeniterzi, 2011). A dynamic topic model that builds topics with respect to information from the previous time point is proposed by Frermann and Lapata (2016) and again sense novelty is evaluated.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes mainly (i), semantic similarity models assuming one sense for each word and then measuring its spatial displacement by a similarity metric (such as cosine) in a semantic vector space (Gulordava and Baroni, 2011;Xu and Kemp, 2015;Eger and Mehler, 2016;Hellrich and Hahn, 2016;Hamilton et al, 2016a,b) and (ii), word sense induction models (WSI) inferring for each word a probability distribution over different word senses (or topics) in turn modeled as a distribution over words (Wang and Mccallum, 2006;Bamman and Crane, 2011;Wijaya and Yeniterzi, 2011;Lau et al, 2012;Mihalcea and Nastase, 2012;Frermann and Lapata, 2016).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%