2021
DOI: 10.1002/piq.21364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UnderstandingMulti‐levelLearning in Organizations: A Comparison of Lean and the Learning Organization

Abstract: Learning organization (LO) models emphasize learning at multiple levels (individual, team, and organization). The Lean literature addresses multi‐level improvement in performance with specific strategies to coordinate and mobilize individuals, teams, and organizations. We review the key models in LO and Lean literatures to identify factors that facilitate learning and performance, respectively. We compare and contrast Lean and LO characteristics for better understanding of how divergent foci on learning and pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Kim (2005) analysed individual learning factors in government organisations, and Tortorella and Fogliatto (2014) analysed organisational learning factors in an automotive manufacturer. Some studies emphasise learning at multiple levels (individual, team and organisation (Alagaraja and Herd, 2021), whereas Tortorella et al (2020) discussed the importance of identifying the relationship between lean production practices and the learning organisation dimensions. However, very few studies focus on factors that affect employees’ lean disposition (Tortorella and Fogliatto, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Kim (2005) analysed individual learning factors in government organisations, and Tortorella and Fogliatto (2014) analysed organisational learning factors in an automotive manufacturer. Some studies emphasise learning at multiple levels (individual, team and organisation (Alagaraja and Herd, 2021), whereas Tortorella et al (2020) discussed the importance of identifying the relationship between lean production practices and the learning organisation dimensions. However, very few studies focus on factors that affect employees’ lean disposition (Tortorella and Fogliatto, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marsick and Watkins (2003) have suggested seven building blocks of LO operationalised at the individual, group, and organisational level, which Garvin has extended by adding leadership dimension that reinforces learning. Despite these significant research and varied perspectives, there is a paucity of empirical research that studies multi-level outcomes of LO, including individual, team, organisation-wide, and inter-organisational (Morland et al, 2018;Alagaraja and Herd, 2022). Future studies measuring the mediating role of individual and group-level outcomes between learning organisation and organisational-wide performance can be taken-up.…”
Section: Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these significant research and varied perspectives, there is a paucity of empirical research that studies multi-level outcomes of LO, including individual, team, organisation-wide, and inter-organisational (Morland et al. , 2018; Alagaraja and Herd, 2022). Future studies measuring the mediating role of individual and group-level outcomes between learning organisation and organisational-wide performance can be taken-up. More inclusive research for developing nations …”
Section: Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every company has a different organizational culture, which is important for the survival of the company. When employees imitate behaviors that are consistent with their organizational culture, they are satisfied and even get direct or indirect rewards for maximizing the resulting performance [5]. Competition in business requires the advantage of the company to be as good as other competitors along with the development of business challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%