2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11191-023-00478-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Science Identity Development Among College Students

Zhimeng Jiang,
Bing Wei
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the effect of virtual laboratory training on science identity has not been explicitly examined in the literature [3], we wanted to determine if engaging in the virtual simulation affected this motivational belief as it is an important metric for student persistence and success in STEM fields [23]. The 2x3 (time x group) mixed ANOVA showed no significant main effect of time (F(1, 130) = .53, p = .47), group (F(2, 130) = 2.68, p = .07), or timexgroup interaction (F(2, 130) = .52, p = .60) ( Table 4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the effect of virtual laboratory training on science identity has not been explicitly examined in the literature [3], we wanted to determine if engaging in the virtual simulation affected this motivational belief as it is an important metric for student persistence and success in STEM fields [23]. The 2x3 (time x group) mixed ANOVA showed no significant main effect of time (F(1, 130) = .53, p = .47), group (F(2, 130) = 2.68, p = .07), or timexgroup interaction (F(2, 130) = .52, p = .60) ( Table 4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, based on research on the factors that impact science identity development [15, 21] and common instructional approaches in designing of laboratory simulations [10, 22], it is reasonable to assume that student engagement with virtual laboratory environments has the potential to impact their science identity analogous to physical laboratory training. In particular, elements of virtual simulations such as 1) the use of active learning [23], 2) reduction or removal of barriers to access [10], and 3) reduction of risk and providing space for students to fail [24] all have the potential to increase students’ science identity by bolstering competence, increasing performance, and promoting self-acknowledgement [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the effect of virtual laboratory training on science identity has not been explicitly examined in the literature [ 8 ], we wanted to determine if engaging in the virtual simulation affected this motivational belief as it is an important metric for student persistence and success in STEM fields [ 28 ]. The 2x3 (timexgroup) mixed ANCOVA showed no significant main effect of time ( F (1,127) = 2.43, p = .12), group ( F (2,127) = 2.82, p = .06), or timexgroup interaction ( F (2,127) = .29, p = .75) ( Table 4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, based on research on the factors that impact science identity development [ 20 , 26 ] and common instructional approaches in designing of laboratory simulations [ 15 , 27 ], it is reasonable to assume that student engagement with virtual laboratory environments has the potential to impact their science identity analogous to physical laboratory training. In particular, elements of virtual simulations such as 1) the use of active learning [ 28 ], 2) reduction or removal of barriers to access [ 15 ], and 3) reduction of risk and providing space for students to fail [ 29 ] all have the potential to increase students’ science identity by bolstering competence, increasing performance, and promoting self-acknowledgement [ 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%