2021
DOI: 10.1002/pra2.433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Research Data Repositories as Infrastructures

Abstract: This study discusses the properties of research data repositories and explores metadata about 2,646 entries in the Registry of Research Data Repositories (re3data.org) to identify the characteristics attributed to infrastructures they exhibit. The results reveal how research data repositories function as information infrastructure for scientific community members and contribute to the small body of literature that examines data repositories through a sociotechnical lens.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies reusing re3data metadata include analyses of the overall RDR landscape, the landscape of RDRs in a specific domain, or the RDR landscape of a region or country. Some examples of studies reusing re3data metadata for research are: Overall studies: Boyd 83 examined the extent to which RDR exhibit properties of infrastructures. Khan & Ahangar 84 and Hansson & Dahlgren 85 focused on the openness of RDRs from a global perspective.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies reusing re3data metadata include analyses of the overall RDR landscape, the landscape of RDRs in a specific domain, or the RDR landscape of a region or country. Some examples of studies reusing re3data metadata for research are: Overall studies: Boyd 83 examined the extent to which RDR exhibit properties of infrastructures. Khan & Ahangar 84 and Hansson & Dahlgren 85 focused on the openness of RDRs from a global perspective.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall studies: Boyd 83 examined the extent to which RDR exhibit properties of infrastructures. Khan & Ahangar 84 and Hansson & Dahlgren 85 focused on the openness of RDRs from a global perspective.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim (2018) carried out a study using the re3data registry as a data source and analyzed data profiles for three leading Asian economies: Korea, China and Japan, and examined how individual countries contribute to the repository, organizational type, versioning and product quality management and subject tagging; and concluded that all three Asian countries still fall short in terms of involvement. Boyd (2021) analyzes the metadata for 2,646 entries in the re3data registry (re3data.org) and discusses the characteristics of RDR to determine the characteristics attributed to the infrastructures they exhibit. The findings demonstrate how RDR serve as the information infrastructure for the scientific community.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, data mining mechanisms have evolved in order to adapt to the diversity of data types (Abaszade & Effati, 2019;Jaramillo, Garzás & Redchuk, 2021;Segura, Vidal-Castro, Menéndez-Domínguez, Campos & Prieto, 2011). A variety of tools have been created in accordance with diverse needs in terms of shared resources (Bashir, Gul, Bashir, Nisa & Ganaie, 2021;Boyd, 2021;Fan, Xia, Lo, Hassan & Li, 2021). Some of the tools used under the concept of free distribution software are DSpace, VuFind, Evergreen ILS, Fedora Commons, Invenio, Greenstone Digital Library, Ambra, E-Prints and RODA (Bankier & Gleason, 2014;Beazley, 2011;Pyrounakis, Nikolaidou & Hatzopoulos, 2014).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%