Understanding regional variation in the use of local food in public catering

Abstract

PurposeThe main aim of this study is to identify the factors that can affect regional differences in the procurement of local food in public catering. Understanding how some regions procure more local food products than others could help promote the use of local food in public catering. Regions with a lower share of local food can learn from regions that have a higher local food share.Design/methodology/approachThe studied phenomenon is complex; therefore, we used several approaches to identify the share of local food procurement and the reasons behind the regional differences. The study gathered survey data and used fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), a computable general equilibrium model and several data sources.FindingsThe share of local food within the total food procurement varies markedly between regions. The highest local food shares can be linked to a combination of three factors: sufficient and suitable supply, adequate organisational conditions and a political atmosphere that encourages the use of local food. In addition to limited political incentives, poor supply or inadequate organisational conditions effectively characterise why some regions use very few local food products. Hence, a move towards using more local food in public catering requires political decision makers, food producers and procurement personnel to demonstrate a common will and take cohesive action.Originality/valueBy examining regional variation, the results of this study offer a new perspective on the use of local food in public catering.

Food-Energy Integration in Primary Production and Food Processing Results in a More Equal Distribution of Economic Value Across Regional Food Systems: Nordic Case Study from Circular Perspective

“…Finally, a transition towards RFS would not only result in the redistribution of the economic activity across regional food systems; it would also have wider regional economic impacts for other sectors. Multiplier effects of food production on regional output can be almost the same size as the direct affect [41,42]. In addition, the total regional economic impact of biogas production can also be bigger than the direct impact [43].…”

Underscoring flavor or healthiness? The effectiveness of different communication appeals in promoting local food and the moderating role of individual construal

“…Local food marketing is fundamentally distinct from general food marketing. The former involves food products that are produced within a limited mile range (Kujala et al, 2021; Onozaka et al, 2010) and sold either directly by the producer or through a narrower range of intermediaries (Feldmann & Hamm, 2015). The common target audience of local food marketing strategies is consumers who want to find high‐quality food products while supporting their local economy and reducing pollution (Kemp et al, 2010).…”

“…Various parts of the world are experiencing a surging interest toward local food, which is food produced and consumed in the same geographical region (Kujala et al, 2021). Consumers, the media, and scholars in several domains have steadily realized that local food represents a more sustainable and healthier consumption pattern—and as such, may benefit societies (Schmitt et al, 2017).…”

Nested circularity : Localized food in a globalized world

“…Multiplier effects of food production on regional output can be almost the same size as the direct affect (e.g. Kujala et al, 2021;Schmit et al, 2016). In addition, the total regional economic impact of biogas production can also be bigger than the direct impact (Peura et al, 2018).…”