2000
DOI: 10.1080/13563470050020167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Processes of Informal Housing: Appropriate Methodological Tools for a Sensitive Research Area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The shortcomings of the data on which this group of research is based are the result of the complexity of mapping informal settlements. Most developing nations do not have the technical capacity, or the resources, to map informal areas in detail, and even when the capability exists, some governments regulations forbid or impede the mapping, recording, or sharing of public data of such populations [13][14][15]. Limitations on resources, or regulatory approaches in some cases, leave empty spaces where informal settlements exist on maps [16].…”
Section: Measuring Informal Settlementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shortcomings of the data on which this group of research is based are the result of the complexity of mapping informal settlements. Most developing nations do not have the technical capacity, or the resources, to map informal areas in detail, and even when the capability exists, some governments regulations forbid or impede the mapping, recording, or sharing of public data of such populations [13][14][15]. Limitations on resources, or regulatory approaches in some cases, leave empty spaces where informal settlements exist on maps [16].…”
Section: Measuring Informal Settlementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In interviews with land squatters, Zetter and DeSouza (2000) recognized that the values and norms of the participants may have been different from the interviewer's values and, in some cases, outside the law. Thus, they chose to accept (or agree with) the participants' perspectives and not to make judgments or question the participants' ethics or legality.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Με βάση τη συζήτηση που προηγήθηκε, στον πίνακα 11.1 παρατίθενται οι κυριότεροι άμεσοι και βαθύτεροι παράγοντες που σύμφωνα με τη σχετική βιβλιογραφία, σχετίζονται στενά με το φαινόμενο της αυθαίρετης δόμησης Zetter and De Souza, 2000;Huchzermeyer, 2003;Karathanassi et al, 2003;. (Johnson, 2002), προσδιορίζει και τη φυσιογνωμία και το είδος του αναπτυξιακού της προτύπου.…”
Section: το πλαισιο της εμπειρικης ερευναςunclassified