2014
DOI: 10.1193/021713eqs036m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Poor Seismic Performance of Concrete Walls and Design Implications

Abstract: The 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquakes in New Zealand revealed (1) improved structural response resulting from historical design advancements, (2) poor structural performance due to previously identified shortcomings that had been insufficiently addressed in design practice, and (3) new deficiencies that were not previously recognized because of premature failure resulting from other design flaws. This paper summarizes damage to concrete walls observed in the February 2011 Christchurch earthquake, proposes links… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The vertical reinforcement layout (concentrated or distributed) also influences the contribution of the shear displacements to the total displacements: D s /D f ratios are larger for the flange with concentrated reinforcement layout than for the flange with distributed reinforcement layout case [3,17]. Also this trend is confirmed by results from TUC and TUD, by comparing the two flanges with concentrated (West) and distributed (East) vertical reinforcement distribution under symmetric loading conditions.…”
Section: Shear To Flexural Displacements Ratiossupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The vertical reinforcement layout (concentrated or distributed) also influences the contribution of the shear displacements to the total displacements: D s /D f ratios are larger for the flange with concentrated reinforcement layout than for the flange with distributed reinforcement layout case [3,17]. Also this trend is confirmed by results from TUC and TUD, by comparing the two flanges with concentrated (West) and distributed (East) vertical reinforcement distribution under symmetric loading conditions.…”
Section: Shear To Flexural Displacements Ratiossupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Previous numerical and experimental investigations on RC walls have shown that for concentrated reinforcement layouts, cracks in the unconfined concrete part have larger widths and larger crack spacing than in the distributed layout case [3,16,17].…”
Section: Crack Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The damage to the wall was limited to spalling of cover concrete in the bottom corners. In comparison, Figure 8f shows the extent of damage incurred to RWN used as a reference wall at 2.5% drift ratio, which was because of formation of a traditional plastic hinge, insufficient use of reinforcement between boundary elements despite meeting the code requirements [9], and formation of distributed flexural and shear cracks. The channel at the bottom of the wall seen in Figure 8c experienced some bending towards the end of the test, which appeared to have initiated as a result of spalling of the cover concrete near the wall toes.…”
Section: Test Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sritharan et al (2014) report the occurrence of damage about the lap splice in a 10-m long wall of a 13-story apartment building (Terrace on the Park) built in 1999. The splice had poorly detailed shear reinforcement and lack of ties between the two layers of web reinforcement.…”
Section: Postearthquake Field Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%