Understanding Plain English summaries. A comparison of two approaches to improve the quality of Plain English summaries in research reports

Abstract

Plain English summaryThere is a need for the authors of research reports to be able to communicate their work clearly and effectively to readers who are not familiar with the research area. The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), along with a number of other funding bodies and journals, require researchers to write short lay summaries, often termed plain English summaries (PESs), to make research accessible to the general public. Because many researchers write using technical, specialised language, particularly in scientific reports, writing PESs can be challenging. In this study we looked at how to improve the quality of PESs. We took PESs which had been submitted to the NIHR Journals Library and asked authors to rewrite them using new guidance. We also asked an independent medical writer to edit the summaries. We measured the quality of these three versions (original summary, rewritten summary and edited summary) in two ways. First, we asked a group of people who were not specialists in the subject area to read and rate how easy the summaries were to understand. Secondly, we used a well-known measure called the Flesch reading ease score to assess how easy the PESs were to read. We found that there was no difference in how easy people found the summaries to understand across the three versions. However, the PESs that were rewritten by the authors and that were edited by the independent medical writer were both easier to read than the originals. This shows that PESs can be improved and for organisations who feel that employing an independent writer to edit summaries, providing clear, practical guidance to authors may be a cost-effective alternative.AbstractBackgroundPlain English summaries (PES) or lay summaries are often included as part of research reports and journal articles. These summaries are vital to ensure that research findings are accessible and available to non-specialist audiences, for example patients and members of the public.Writing a PES requires the adoption of a different style than is generally used in a traditional scientific report, and researchers can find this challenging. This study explored two possible ways to improve the quality of PESs in the NIHR Journals Library: 1) Providing enhanced guidance to authors and asking them to rewrite the PES and 2) Employing an independent medical writer to edit the PES.MethodsWe compared the three versions of the PES (original, author rewritten and independent writer edited) to assess 1) how easy they were to understand and 2) how easy they were to read. In order to establish how easy PESs were to understand, a group of 60 public reviewers read a set of summaries and rated them on a four point scale from “Did not understand” to “Understood all”. The Flesch reading ease score was used to measure how easy the summaries were to read.ResultsResults indicated no significant difference across the three versions of the PES in terms of ease of understanding. However, both the author rewritten and independent writer edited versions were significantl...

Randomized controlled trial of plain English and visual abstracts for disseminating surgical research via social media

“…The principle of engaging the public as consumers of research is still in its infancy. There is a good argument that the public should be informed about the findings of research studies, particularly those that are publicly funded, and previous evidence has confirmed that an appetite for this exists. However, it is clear that more work needs to be done in collaboration with the public to understand whether, and how, research should be disseminated beyond traditional scientific communities.…”

Where are biomedical research plain‐language summaries?

“…Using a standard, instantly recognizable icon, such as that inFigure 2, to signpost PLS within an article would also help readers locate them easily. PLS should be developed as part of the full scientific article, by the authors (with professional writing support to ensure appropriate readability)3 and with patients/lay people where possible, and berequired at journal article submission so PLS can be peer-reviewed alongside all other elements of the article. They should be published outside any article paywall and be positioned or signposted to have equal prominence with other key parts of the article.…”

Transformation of Legal Texts into Simplified Accounts to Make the Justice Accessible

“…Likewise, several studies by Lawson (2015), Kirkpatrick & Gaisford (2017), Rubab, (2018), (2019) were executed to transform the complex legal texts into simplified versions. These linguists found the visible difference among the audiences with reference to the intelligibility and time saving.…”