Abstract:Most health technologies are designed to support people who have already decided to work toward better health. Thus, there remains an opportunity to design technologies to help motivate people who have not yet decided to make a change. Understanding the experiences of people who have already started to make a health behavior change and how they made a pivotal decision can be useful in understanding how to design such tools. In this paper, we describe results from data collected in 2 phases. Phase 1 consisted o… Show more
“…Indeed, there is evidence that pivotal experiences (such as LLA) may provide time windows of opportunity when people are open to health behavior changes. 61 Little is known regarding the influence of time since amputation on physical activity. A study of 72 people with LLA from various etiologies (35% nontraumatic, dysvascular) found lower self-reported physical activity to be weakly associated with shorter time since amputation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that people are more able or willing to change walking behaviors early after LLA compared to more than a year after LLA (as in the current trial). Indeed, there is evidence that pivotal experiences (such as LLA) may provide time windows of opportunity when people are open to health behavior changes …”
Background: Lower-limb amputation (LLA) due to non-traumatic vascular etiology is linked to extremely low physical activity and high disability. Objective: To test the feasibility of a biobehavioral intervention designed to promote physical activity. Design: A randomized, single-blind feasibility trial with a crossover design. Setting: Veterans Administration Medical Center. Participants: Military veterans (age: 65.7 [7.8] years; mean [standard deviation]) with nontraumatic lower-limb amputation (LLA), randomized to two groups: GROUP1 (n = 16) and GROUP2 (n = 15). Both groups had similar baseline amputation characteristics (level of amputation and time since amputation). Interventions: Twelve weekly, 30-minute telehealth sessions of physical activity behavior-change intervention, with GROUP1 participating in weeks 1-12 and GROUP2 in weeks 13-24. GROUP1 noncontact phase in weeks 13-24 and GROUP2 attention control telehealth phase in weeks 1-12. Main Outcome Measures: Feasibility (participant retention, dose goal attainment, intervention acceptability [Intrinsic Motivation Inventory [IMI] Interest and Enjoyment scale], safety) and signal of efficacy (free-living physical activity [accelerometer-based average daily step count], Late Life Function and Disability Index-Disability Scale [LLFDI-DS]). Results: Participant retention rate was high (90%), with three participants lost to follow-up during the intervention period. Dose goal attainment was low, with only 10% of participants achieving an a priori walking dose goal. Intervention was rated as acceptable, with mean IMI Interest and Enjoyment score (5.8) statistically higher than the null value of 5.0 (P = .002). There were no between-group differences in adverse event rates (falls: P = .19, lower extremity wounds: P = .60). There was no signal of efficacy for change in average daily step count (d = −0.15) or LLFDI-DS (d = −0.22 and 0.17 for frequency and limitations scales, respectively). Conclusions: Telehealth delivered biobehavioral intervention resulted in acceptable participant retention, low dose goal attainment, high participant acceptability, and low safety risk, while having no signal of efficacy (physical activity, disability) for people with nontraumatic LLA.
“…Indeed, there is evidence that pivotal experiences (such as LLA) may provide time windows of opportunity when people are open to health behavior changes. 61 Little is known regarding the influence of time since amputation on physical activity. A study of 72 people with LLA from various etiologies (35% nontraumatic, dysvascular) found lower self-reported physical activity to be weakly associated with shorter time since amputation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that people are more able or willing to change walking behaviors early after LLA compared to more than a year after LLA (as in the current trial). Indeed, there is evidence that pivotal experiences (such as LLA) may provide time windows of opportunity when people are open to health behavior changes …”
Background: Lower-limb amputation (LLA) due to non-traumatic vascular etiology is linked to extremely low physical activity and high disability. Objective: To test the feasibility of a biobehavioral intervention designed to promote physical activity. Design: A randomized, single-blind feasibility trial with a crossover design. Setting: Veterans Administration Medical Center. Participants: Military veterans (age: 65.7 [7.8] years; mean [standard deviation]) with nontraumatic lower-limb amputation (LLA), randomized to two groups: GROUP1 (n = 16) and GROUP2 (n = 15). Both groups had similar baseline amputation characteristics (level of amputation and time since amputation). Interventions: Twelve weekly, 30-minute telehealth sessions of physical activity behavior-change intervention, with GROUP1 participating in weeks 1-12 and GROUP2 in weeks 13-24. GROUP1 noncontact phase in weeks 13-24 and GROUP2 attention control telehealth phase in weeks 1-12. Main Outcome Measures: Feasibility (participant retention, dose goal attainment, intervention acceptability [Intrinsic Motivation Inventory [IMI] Interest and Enjoyment scale], safety) and signal of efficacy (free-living physical activity [accelerometer-based average daily step count], Late Life Function and Disability Index-Disability Scale [LLFDI-DS]). Results: Participant retention rate was high (90%), with three participants lost to follow-up during the intervention period. Dose goal attainment was low, with only 10% of participants achieving an a priori walking dose goal. Intervention was rated as acceptable, with mean IMI Interest and Enjoyment score (5.8) statistically higher than the null value of 5.0 (P = .002). There were no between-group differences in adverse event rates (falls: P = .19, lower extremity wounds: P = .60). There was no signal of efficacy for change in average daily step count (d = −0.15) or LLFDI-DS (d = −0.22 and 0.17 for frequency and limitations scales, respectively). Conclusions: Telehealth delivered biobehavioral intervention resulted in acceptable participant retention, low dose goal attainment, high participant acceptability, and low safety risk, while having no signal of efficacy (physical activity, disability) for people with nontraumatic LLA.
“…The contextual differences between the fields and the relationships with the game features and theories are articulated in the following sections. 'Challenges' was the most common game feature in health studies; this feature taps into players' tendency to accept challenges in order to onboard and engage, as this behaviour can motivate players to complete the game [54]. Various health studies employ games that apply challenge mechanics that influence players to do or stop certain habits when they play together [87].…”
Over the years, there has been a significant increase in the adoption of game-based interventions for behaviour change associated with many fields such as health, education, and psychology. This is due to the significance of the players’ intrinsic motivation that is naturally generated to play games and the substantial impact they can have on players. Many review papers measure the effectiveness of the use of gaming on changing behaviours; however, these studies neglect the game features involved in the game design process, which have an impact of stimulating behaviour change. Therefore, this paper aimed to identify game design mechanics and features that are reported to commonly influence behaviour change during and/or after the interventions. This paper identified key theories of behaviour change that inform the game design process, providing insights that can be adopted by game designers for informing considerations on the use of game features for moderating behaviour in their own games.
“…Positive transformational experiences following trauma in the form of adversarial or post‐traumatic growth (PTG, Linley & Joseph, ) have received substantial attention in recent decades, and PTG could be said to have become the flagship theme of positive psychology (Joseph, ). Other terms have also been adopted in an attempt to capture the capacity of the human organism for profound and enduring positive change, including transformative change experiences, (White, ) unencumbered moments (Murray, ), turning points (Berglund, ), transformational growth (Ivtzan, Lomas, Hefferon, & Worth, ) and pivotal experiences (Bhattacharya et al., ). Common characteristics among these experiences have been demonstrated.…”
This paper illuminates some of the journey taken by me, the researcher, whilst completing my doctoral research into the lived experience of epiphanies. The research journey is conceptualised as one of the discoveries into the task of qualitative research to "carry forward" the meaning of human experience, that is, considered "more than words can say." Six participants took part in an unstructured interview aimed at exploring how they made sense of their epiphanic experiences. Following the application of an interpretative phenomenological analysis, an arts-based representation of the research findings, in the form of found poetry, was chosen to supplement the emerging interpretation. Six found poems are dispersed throughout the paper. The aim is to offer the reader the crucial opportunity to simultaneously engage responsively and rationally with an exploration of the value of found poetry.Moreover, this style of presentation may offer the reader more space and time to notice, observe and reflect on the impact of research poetry as they move through the paper. An evaluation of the utility of found poetry is also offered. By providing an insight into the process of constructing found poetry, it is intended that the merits of its integration within qualitative enquiry are highlighted as successfully being able to bring the meaning of exceptional human experience alive to the reader. Furthermore, the experiential knowledge offered here is considered particularly relevant to professionals working in caring or therapeutic roles.
K E Y W O R D Sarts-based representation, epiphany, found poetry, interpretative phenomenological analysis, qualitative
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.