Understanding People−Forest Relationships: A Key Requirement for Appropriate Forest Governance in South Sumatra, Indonesia

Abstract

Indonesian forestry challenges in attributional land-use conflicts of overlapping villages and state forests have affected community livelihoods and forest sustainability for decades. This empirical research uncovers the socio-economic attributes of villages in order to gain a better understanding of people−forest relationships in order to guide improved forest management and governance for long-term sustainability. Data were obtained from 69 villages located in the forest management unit of Lakitan Bukit Cogong in South Sumatra Province. Spatially-explicit quantitative measurements and qualitative approaches were employed to explore the interrelationships between human footprint, village development, and conflict resolution strategies over two decades. The results confirmed that utilization of forest areas as part of the village territory (such as for building settlements, public/social infrastructure facilities, plantations and agricultural fields) has long been administered without permits, destabilizing forest functions. Moreover, aspects such as human population size, proximity of villages to the national road and sub-district capital, and the transmigration settlement units have an impact on the Human Footprint Index and Village Development Index. Furthermore, our analyses identified three distinctive forms of conflict based on village type: (1) villages which are administratively included in the forest area; (2) villages for transmigration settlement; and (3) villages adjacent to company management concession areas. In these villages, the clarity of land/forest boundaries and property rights are predominant conflict issues. Several recommendations are proposed to support sustainable forest development; namely, controlling human activities in the forest, improving village management governance, and resolving associated conflicts.

Assessing the Sustainability of NTFP-Based Community Enterprises: A Viable Business Model for Indonesian Rural Forested Areas

“…Since Dutch colonial times, land tenure policies here have promoted resource exploitation [45]. Tenure insecurity over land and natural resources has adversely impacted livelihoods and perpetuated conflict [3]. Land cover is dominated by mixed upland farms and plantations.…”

“…A total of 31,957 villages have a direct relationship with the forest, with 71.06% of them relying on the forest for their livelihoods [2]. It is believed that forest dwellers have been there for a long time [3]. Forests play a significant role in human livelihood and economic development through both direct and indirect contributions [4].…”

Perception of Parents with Low Education on the Continuity of Children’s Education in Indonesia

“…Administratively, Indonesia is not a village or sub-district but part of the Pasirkratonkramat sub-district. Kelurahan is the lowest administrative area led by a lurah (Harbi et al, 2021). According to monograph data in 2014, the total population of Indonesia is based on education level: 136 people are kindergarten graduates, 1,437 are elementary school graduates, 1,628 are junior high school graduates, and 385 are school graduates.…”

Sustainability assessment of economic recovery program in post disaster area at Susup Village, Central Bengkulu, Indonesia

“…The program has been conducted from 2021 to 2022 including forming two farmer groups, assisting technical skill for productive use of natural resources, making marketable product e.g., Coffee and Ginger, as well as submitting legal production certificates (IPRT and halal). The question of whether the program is effective or not and it will be sustain for years to come were always come up on every assistance program, even though some positive example in the strengthening of local capacities has been accomplished and can be describe as "less vulnerable and better prepared" [3] and for small forest enterprises (SFE) at social forestry program [4,5]…”