2015
DOI: 10.3828/idpr.2015.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding participation in development: towards a framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(c) Participant empowerment: The participation of stakeholders in the decisions that affect them increases their capacity to influence such decisions, and thus increases their ownership of, commitment to and confidence in the outcomes [57][58][59][60]. (d) Better management and accountability: Participation and citizen engagement have been primarily defined as sources of empowerment and conditions for accountability [61][62][63]. Participation improves management decisions, as it allows for the integration of different sources of knowledge and increases the capacity for selecting suitable solutions [64].…”
Section: Participation In Water and Sanitation: The Outcomes And Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(c) Participant empowerment: The participation of stakeholders in the decisions that affect them increases their capacity to influence such decisions, and thus increases their ownership of, commitment to and confidence in the outcomes [57][58][59][60]. (d) Better management and accountability: Participation and citizen engagement have been primarily defined as sources of empowerment and conditions for accountability [61][62][63]. Participation improves management decisions, as it allows for the integration of different sources of knowledge and increases the capacity for selecting suitable solutions [64].…”
Section: Participation In Water and Sanitation: The Outcomes And Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His paper, written with Stephen Jones and Andrew Kardan, considers participatory approaches to develop ment, highlighting the benefits of adopting a more disaggregated and less normative approach to participation (Holland, Jones and Kardan, 2015). Using an analysis of the Malawian health sector, they illustrate the benefits of a framework for analysing partic ipation which they have developed.…”
Section: The Collectionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Framed as an alternative to externally imposed, expertoriented development prescriptions which treat the poor as passive recipients, 'bottom-up' participatory approaches view those on the margins as valuable actors and repositories of knowledge, whose active contribution can greatly improve the relevance, efficiency and sustainability of development projects (Cooke and Kothari, 2001, 5). Critical to the systematic endorsement of this paradigm shift from 'top-down' to 'bottom-up' are claims of 'empowerment' (Henkel and Stirrat, 2001, 171;Hickey and Mohan, 2005;Holland et al, 2015); a presumed outcome secured through the inclusion and participation of 'beneficiaries'. These purported empowering benefits extend to the realm of DRRM, where citizen participation and community engagement are increasingly promoted as crucial to hazard mitigation, vulnerability reduction and 'resilience-building' (Fernandez et al, 2012).…”
Section: Problematising Participation Empowerment and Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%