2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2016.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding overall output efficiency in public transit systems: The roles of input regulations, perceived budget and input subsidies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the discussion above, it was suggested that there might be a trade-off between capex (BRT standard) and revenue generating opex (Fleet). Whilst the analysis does not find that cost effectiveness is impacted by the BRT standard, the positive impact of BRT standard on input effectiveness suggests that the results for the BRT context are in line with already published literature around the performance measurement of conventional/ regular public bus transport (Obeng et al, 2016). Moreover, the results show similarity with heavy rail and metro systems (Tsai et al, 2015) with BRT systems generally benefiting from economies of scale, however also suffering from diseconomies of scale when cost effectiveness is considered (starting at BRT systems having an excess of 300 buses in their fleet).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the discussion above, it was suggested that there might be a trade-off between capex (BRT standard) and revenue generating opex (Fleet). Whilst the analysis does not find that cost effectiveness is impacted by the BRT standard, the positive impact of BRT standard on input effectiveness suggests that the results for the BRT context are in line with already published literature around the performance measurement of conventional/ regular public bus transport (Obeng et al, 2016). Moreover, the results show similarity with heavy rail and metro systems (Tsai et al, 2015) with BRT systems generally benefiting from economies of scale, however also suffering from diseconomies of scale when cost effectiveness is considered (starting at BRT systems having an excess of 300 buses in their fleet).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Tsai et al, 2015 in the metropolitan train operation context). In a very recent paper, Obeng et al (2016) separated stochastic and systematic technical inefficiencies and analysed determinants for the latter, most notably subsidies and regulation. Their results suggest that capital expenditure subsidies for single mode bus PT systems have a very significant positive impact on PT efficiency.…”
Section: Merkert Mulley and Hakimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The government must deeply understand the diversity of individual travel demand and factors behind their choice, otherwise the transport policies will be ineffective (3,4,5). However, unilateral optimization of transit system was not effective enough to significantly increase its transport efficiency (6). Note that, the efficient approach to optimize transit system is to balance the relationship between travel behavior and the built environment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stephen Schmidt [5] indicated that, from the perspective of the population and bus operating mileage subsidy model, increased spending on subsidy may lead to low efficiency; accordingly, certain suggestions for improvement were presented. Obeng et al [6] analyzed the comprehensive effects of subsidies, regulations, and perceived budgets and subsequently established a scientific calculation model. Boitani and Cambini [7] proposed an improved non-Bayesian model based on economics, focusing on the means of reducing operating cost and improving the bus service quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%