“…First, this study contributed to the literature on the impact of social media during the COVID-19 pandemic. Compared with previous studies ( Dib et al, 2021 , Gudi et al, 2022 , Malova, 2021 , Nair et al, 2021 , Wilson and Wiysonge, 2020 ), this study complementarily identified the specific mechanisms through which vaccine news from social media affects vaccine hesitancy and vaccination behavior. Additionally, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, this study investigated the effect of social media information with a novel lens (i.e., vaccine safety news from social media and vaccine risk news from social media).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, social media has emerged as a crucial factor in shaping vaccine hesitancy. Prior studies have mainly focused on different types of social media ( Liu et al, 2021 ), misinformation ( Dib et al, 2021 , Gudi et al, 2022 , Lu et al, 2022 ), the content of conversations ( Malova, 2021 ) and the impact of anti-vaccination information ( Nair et al, 2021 , Wilson and Wiysonge, 2020 ) on social media. However, few studies analyzed vaccine safety news and risk news from social media, and few have examined the mechanisms by which social media information influences vaccine hesitancy and vaccination behavior.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, an increasing number of individuals acquire vaccination guidance through social media platforms ( Paramita et al, 2021 ). Given the ongoing concerns about the safety and risks of the COVID-19 vaccines ( Calnan and Douglass, 2020 , Malova, 2021 ), people actively turn to social media for news about the safety and risks of the COVID-19 vaccines. People's exposure to the information is related to their subsequent vaccination attitudes and behaviors ( Dunn et al, 2017 , Xu, 2019 ).…”
“…First, this study contributed to the literature on the impact of social media during the COVID-19 pandemic. Compared with previous studies ( Dib et al, 2021 , Gudi et al, 2022 , Malova, 2021 , Nair et al, 2021 , Wilson and Wiysonge, 2020 ), this study complementarily identified the specific mechanisms through which vaccine news from social media affects vaccine hesitancy and vaccination behavior. Additionally, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, this study investigated the effect of social media information with a novel lens (i.e., vaccine safety news from social media and vaccine risk news from social media).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, social media has emerged as a crucial factor in shaping vaccine hesitancy. Prior studies have mainly focused on different types of social media ( Liu et al, 2021 ), misinformation ( Dib et al, 2021 , Gudi et al, 2022 , Lu et al, 2022 ), the content of conversations ( Malova, 2021 ) and the impact of anti-vaccination information ( Nair et al, 2021 , Wilson and Wiysonge, 2020 ) on social media. However, few studies analyzed vaccine safety news and risk news from social media, and few have examined the mechanisms by which social media information influences vaccine hesitancy and vaccination behavior.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, an increasing number of individuals acquire vaccination guidance through social media platforms ( Paramita et al, 2021 ). Given the ongoing concerns about the safety and risks of the COVID-19 vaccines ( Calnan and Douglass, 2020 , Malova, 2021 ), people actively turn to social media for news about the safety and risks of the COVID-19 vaccines. People's exposure to the information is related to their subsequent vaccination attitudes and behaviors ( Dunn et al, 2017 , Xu, 2019 ).…”
“…Heated reactions and polarization are frequent responses to societal and health crises, and COVID-19 was no exception (see Hiaeshutter-Rice & Hawkins, 2022; Vochocová et al, 2022). The unpredictable character of the pandemic and its impact on several spheres of everyday life, in combination with chaotic responses from the government, fueled the spread of disinformation, hate speech, and personal attacks in online environments (see Malova, 2021; Vergani et al, 2022). During this period, social media became an important venue for public discussion.…”
Section: Online Discussion During the Covid-19 Pandemicmentioning
The COVID-19 pandemic has fueled heated discussions and intensified polarization in the exchange of opinions. Due to strict government restrictions, including a hard lockdown, much of this debate took place online. In this study, we examine how Czechs engaged in political discussions on Facebook during the pandemic. This research looks into the occurrence of incivility and intolerance and the similarities/contrasts with normatively desirable discursive features. We also focus on the perception of differences between various types of antinormative expressions among participants in online discussions and their roles. We use a mixed-method approach: a quantitative content analysis of comments on the Facebook pages of two of the Czech Republic’s most popular news media outlets (i.e., public service television, ČT24, and commercial television, TN.CZ) and two top Czech politicians (Andrej Babiš and Tomio Okamura); and qualitative interviews with 20 participants collected during the Springs of 2021. Data were downloaded by Facepager during the hard lockdown in the Czech Republic (March and April 2021), and the final sample consisted of 1,792 comments. We reveal that incivility, when expressed with a justified opinion, was less likely to directly attack other commenters within the thread. We also observe differences in the amount of incivility in politicians’ pages compared to the news media. Incivility has increased over time since the hard lockdown started. We address the implications of different conditions in which incivility and intolerance occurred and their impact on deliberative democracy.
“…However, the previous literature has tended to focus on specific elements of the debate (e.g., tone about vaccines, or content about vaccine side effects, etc.) [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] but has not yet explored how the different features and dimensions of the public discourse about vaccines are related to each other. Precisely, the main goal of our study is to identify the different characteristics of vaccine-related discourses and explore its patterns of association.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.