1987
DOI: 10.1002/pdi.1960040204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding of diabetes mellitus in non‐diabetic adults

Abstract: What non‐diabetic adults know about diabetes does not seem to have been previously quantified in the UK. This information would be helpful in planning the education of newly diagnosed diabetics, their families and the public. Five hundred self‐administered questionnaires were completed by employed people in different parts of Avon County, England. Of these questionnaires, 436 were suitable for analysis. Total knowledge scores were greater for respondents in Social Classes 1, 2 and 3 non‐manual, compared with o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…45% of patients in one study sited the liver in the supra pubic region (Bayle, 1970). Common conditions such as diabetes are also misunderstood by the public (Hoghton et al, 1987). In this context there are many interesting new learning opportunities in health educa-tion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45% of patients in one study sited the liver in the supra pubic region (Bayle, 1970). Common conditions such as diabetes are also misunderstood by the public (Hoghton et al, 1987). In this context there are many interesting new learning opportunities in health educa-tion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among people with diabetes these were: the optimistic bias subscale of the Risk Perception Survey-Diabetes Mellitus (RPS-DM) [28]; the personal control subscale of the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) [29,30]; the self-care ability subscale which was adopted from the Diabetes Care Profile (DCP) [31]; diabetesrelated stigmatization with two items adopted from the Diabetes Representative Survey [32] and a new item based on the Type 2 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale (DSAS-2) [33]; the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale -Five-item Short Form (PAID-5) [34]; the Two-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) [35]; the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care-DAWN Short Form (PACIC-DSF) [36]; and the Information Needs in Diabetes Questionnaire (IND) [37]. Among people without diabetes these were: the optimistic bias subscale of the Risk Perception Survey-Developing Diabetes (RPS-DD) [38]; the personal control subscale of the RPS-DD [38]; diabetes-related stigmatization with two items adopted from the Diabetes Representative Survey and a new item based on the DSAS-2 [33]; actual diabetes knowledge with two items adopted from Hoghton et al [39] and four new items; and the IND [37] (with only 5 items).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%