Understanding Nutritional Epidemiology and Its Role in Policy

Abstract

Nutritional epidemiology has recently been criticized on several fronts, including the inability to measure diet accurately, and for its reliance on observational studies to address etiologic questions. In addition, several recent meta-analyses with serious methodologic flaws have arrived at erroneous or misleading conclusions, reigniting controversy over formerly settled debates. All of this has raised questions regarding the ability of nutritional epidemiologic studies to inform policy. These criticisms, to a large degree, stem from a misunderstanding of the methodologic issues of the field and the inappropriate use of the drug trial paradigm in nutrition research. The exposure of interest in nutritional epidemiology is human diet, which is a complex system of interacting components that cumulatively affect health. Consequently, nutritional epidemiology constantly faces a unique set of challenges and continually develops specific methodologies to address these. Misunderstanding these issues can lead to the nonconstructive and sometimes naive criticisms we see today. This article aims to clarify common misunderstandings of nutritional epidemiology, address challenges to the field, and discuss the utility of nutritional science in guiding policy by focusing on 5 broad questions commonly asked of the field.

Nutrigenomics, the Microbiome, and Gene-Environment Interactions: New Directions in Cardiovascular Disease Research, Prevention, and Treatment

“…The limitations of observational cohort studies and of randomized, clinical trials have been discussed at length and are beyond the scope of this review, 11 but we highlight important aspects to provide context about why additional insights can be gained through incorporation of measures of the genome, epigenome, metabolome, proteome, microbiome, and other relevant factors.…”

Misvisende om kosthold i ny nasjonal retningslinje for forebygging av hjerte- og karsykdommer

“…Eksempelvis ble røyking og høyt blodtrykk identifisert som risikofaktorer for hjertesykdom i observasjonsstudier. Å studere sammenhenger mellom kosthold og sykdom er imidlertid svaert komplekst 167,223 . Ettersom man i en observasjonsstudie aldri kan ha fullstendig kontroll over absolutt alle faktorer en person utsettes for, kan man ikke fastslå om sammenhengene som observeres skyldes en årsakssammen-heng mellom faktorene man undersøker, selv om vi i dag har en rekke teknikker for å begrense potensielle feilslutninger.…”

Relative Validity and Reproducibility of a New 44-Item Diet and Food Frequency Questionnaire Among Adults: Online Assessment (Preprint)

“…Among the various available tools that evaluate individual dietary intake, the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) has been frequently used in nutritional epidemiology studies since the 1980s (4)(5)(6). Despite limitations (difficulties to estimate habitual intakes, memory bias, errors in perception of portion sizes, and use of restricted food lists), FFQs collect valuable information allowing researchers to assess the usual diet at a low cost and logistic burden, and can be selfadministered (5)(6)(7).…”