2024
DOI: 10.3390/bs14030158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Mobile OTT Service Users’ Resistance to Participation in Wireless D2D Caching Networks

Yumi Jang,
Seongcheol Kim

Abstract: With the explosive pace of mobile over-the-top (OTT) video content streaming services, mobile network traffic has seen unprecedented growth in recent years. However, the limitation of antenna performance, the burden of investment cost, and restricted resources hinder improving the current mobile networks’ functionality. Accordingly, wireless device-to-device (D2D) caching networks came to the fore as one of the competitive alternatives for alleviating the overloads of mobile network traffic. Wireless D2D cachi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 84 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research on users’ psychological barriers to mobile caching suggests that potential user resistance may not be as great as feared. Especially when the benefits of participation, such as an improved content viewing experience, are effectively communicated to users 46 . Specifically, the simulation settings of the SCAC framework, which limit data usage to 3 GB, are reasonable and reflect realistic usage scenarios that are palatable to users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on users’ psychological barriers to mobile caching suggests that potential user resistance may not be as great as feared. Especially when the benefits of participation, such as an improved content viewing experience, are effectively communicated to users 46 . Specifically, the simulation settings of the SCAC framework, which limit data usage to 3 GB, are reasonable and reflect realistic usage scenarios that are palatable to users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%