Understanding key features of bacterial restriction-modification systems through quantitative modeling

Abstract

BackgroundRestriction-modification (R-M) systems are rudimentary bacterial immune systems. The main components include restriction enzyme (R), which cuts specific unmethylated DNA sequences, and the methyltransferase (M), which protects the same DNA sequences. The expression of R-M system components is considered to be tightly regulated, to ensure successful establishment in a naïve bacterial host. R-M systems are organized in different architectures (convergent or divergent) and are characterized by different features, i.e. binding cooperativities, dissociation constants of dimerization, translation rates, which ensure this tight regulation. It has been proposed that R-M systems should exhibit certain dynamical properties during the system establishment, such as: i) a delayed expression of R with respect to M, ii) fast transition of R from “OFF” to “ON” state, iii) increased stability of the toxic molecule (R) steady-state levels. It is however unclear how different R-M system features and architectures ensure these dynamical properties, particularly since it is hard to address this question experimentally.ResultsTo understand design of different R-M systems, we computationally analyze two R-M systems, representative of the subset controlled by small regulators called ‘C proteins’, and differing in having convergent or divergent promoter architecture. We show that, in the convergent system, abolishing any of the characteristic system features adversely affects the dynamical properties outlined above. Moreover, an extreme binding cooperativity, accompanied by a very high dissociation constant of dimerization, observed in the convergent system, but absent from other R-M systems, can be explained in terms of the same properties. Furthermore, we develop the first theoretical model for dynamics of a divergent R-M system, which does not share any of the convergent system features, but has overlapping promoters. We show that i) the system dynamics exhibits the same three dynamical properties, ii) introducing any of the convergent system features to the divergent system actually diminishes these properties.ConclusionsOur results suggest that different R-M architectures and features may be understood in terms of constraints imposed by few simple dynamical properties of the system, providing a unifying framework for understanding these seemingly diverse systems. We also provided predictions for the perturbed R-M systems dynamics, which may in future be tested through increasingly available experimental techniques, such as re-engineering R-M systems and single-cell experiments.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12918-016-0377-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Guide RNA categorization enables target site choice in Tn7-CRISPR-Cas transposons

“…These systems take advantage of "zygotic" induction where the gene program is reset when they enter a new host that lack the Xre protein. This type of regulatory scheme was investigated in restriction-modification systems which utilize XRE family regulator C proteins to control temporal regulation of methylation and restriction (Rodic et al, 2017). When the restriction-modification system enters a naïve host on a mobile element, methylation of host DNA must precede endonuclease expression to prevent self-degradation.…”

Genome-wide high-throughput signal peptide screening via plasmid pUC256E improves protease secretion in Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Pediococcus acidilactici

“…Genome analysis revealed that L. plantarum SH LP contains a type IV restriction modification (R-M) system, which degrades methylated foreign DNAs. R-M systems in bacteria act as important defence mechanisms against invading genomes [47,48]. To solve this issue, E. coli C2925 was chosen for unmethylated plasmid preparation, resulting in at least 1000-fold improved transformation efficiency of L. plantarum.…”

Endogenous Gene Regulation as a Predicted Main Function of Type I-E CRISPR/Cas System in E. coli

“…It is clear that such highly efficient, and temporally specific response, may be highly desirable for gene expression regulation. In fact, we also previously showed that bacterial restriction modification systems—a more rudimental class of bacterial immune systems—exhibit gene expression regulation with such features [30,31,32].…”