2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding joint action: Current theoretical and empirical approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current landscape of research focussing on ‘real’ social interactions is one of new, exciting and innovative methodological techniques and paradigms. Yet, at the current time the focus of such research is limited to relatively specific research areas such as social attention [ 14 , 16 ], joint action [ 65 ] and conversation [ 44 ]. As highlighted throughout this review, studies across these areas have provided an understanding of how critical it is to study social behaviour within social contexts and a key understanding now emerging is that interactive processes are not just merely a context in which behaviour happens.…”
Section: Moving Beyond Social Attention: the Effect Of Social Presenc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current landscape of research focussing on ‘real’ social interactions is one of new, exciting and innovative methodological techniques and paradigms. Yet, at the current time the focus of such research is limited to relatively specific research areas such as social attention [ 14 , 16 ], joint action [ 65 ] and conversation [ 44 ]. As highlighted throughout this review, studies across these areas have provided an understanding of how critical it is to study social behaviour within social contexts and a key understanding now emerging is that interactive processes are not just merely a context in which behaviour happens.…”
Section: Moving Beyond Social Attention: the Effect Of Social Presenc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measures of conversational entrainment (i.e., synchronization between speakers [64]) based on physical properties of speech (e.g., rate, rhythm, pitch and pause length) can be considered based on the similarity between two speakers' temporal windows in which alignment occurs [65]. The second class of measures includes non-verbal readouts such as facial [5] and motor behavioural matching [66], bodily synergy [67], joint action [68] and motion energy [69]. Of note, behavioural matching can be either implicit (mimicry) or explicit (imitation) [5] and either symmetrical or antisymmetrical [60].…”
Section: Quantifying Interpersonal Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we highlight coordinative AO + MI (coordAO + MI) as a further, fascinating scenario for study. CoordAO + MI can be regarded as a special case of joint action (Sebanz & Knoblich, 2021;van der Wel et al, 2021), because the observer imagines responding to, or performing with the actions of another person. In coordAO + MI, however, one's own action is not executed, as it would be in joint action.…”
Section: Coordinative Ao + MImentioning
confidence: 99%