Understanding intentions and actual use of mobile wallets by millennial: an extended TAM model perspective

Abstract

Purpose The present study aims to probe into the determinants of mobile wallet adoption by millennials with the assistance of extended technology acceptance model. Design/methodology/approach The data was collected from the students studying professional courses in leading private universities in the north region of India. Keeping in view of the objective and hypotheses, the Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling (PLS -SEM) technique was used to test the proposed model. Findings The tested model brings into notice the imperative observation, which clearly outlines that there are all significant relationships, which can be observed herein. To explicitly state: perceived ease of use (PEOU) has a significant positive relationship with the perceived usefulness followed by PEOU also shares a significant positive relationship with the behavioral intention, and lastly trust as a variable under study establishes a significant positive relationship with actual use (AU). Research limitations/implications Implications for the banking industry are to ensure the safety and privacy (financial information) confidential. Originality/value The present study contributes to the literature of mobile wallet in the developing nations.

Mobile wallet adoption intention amid COVID-19 pandemic outbreak: A novel conceptual framework

“…Thus, the ease of effort may encourage customers to utilise mobile payments and positively influence their intention to adopt mobile payments, whereas technical constraints like difficulty in data entry or small screen size led to dissatisfaction and non-acceptance among some users ( Shankar and Datta, 2018 ). Studies in the past literature outlined the impact of ease of effort on users’ intention ( Chawla and Joshi, 2017 , George and Sunny, 2021 , Sarmah et al, 2021 ). Thus, researchers propose the following hypothesis.…”

“…Particularly, after demonetisation, India witnessed a serious issue in making payment due to limited availability of the hard cash and people started showing favourable intention towards digital payment ( Chawla and Joshi, 2019 ). COVID-19 pandemic has further accelerated the consumers favourable intention towards m-wallets ( Sarmah et al, 2021 ). Preventive measures like social distancing compelled users to utilise m-wallets for making payments and transferring money.…”

The Growth Trajectory of Upi-Based Mobile Payments in India: Enablers and Inhibitors

“…M-payment allows users to complete their payments anytime and anywhere in a simple, safer, quicker, and more convenient way (Liébana-Cabanillas et al, 2014;Zhou, 2013). M-payment advantages include ease (Sarmah et al, 2020), location independence (Mallat et al, 2009), and its adoption gets affected by several factors, i.e., visibility (Johnson et al, 2018), perceived transaction speed (Teo et al, 2015), privacy concerns (Thakur & Srivastava, 2013) and effort expectancy (Tak & Panwar, 2017). Millennials are known for their high use of information and communications technologies (Xiang et al, 2015), and they are the centre of tomorrow's consumer spending (Kim et al, 2015).…”

The effect of e-WOM on customer satisfaction through ease of use, perceived usefulness and e-wallet payment

“…TAM allows users to achieve the expected goals according to their needs (Jawad et al, 2022). E-wallet payments using TAM (technology acceptance model) in continuous mobile use (Lew et al, 2020;Singh et al, 2020;Sarmah et al, 2021). Teng & Khong (2021) stated that mobile payments could be categorized as remote and proximity payments.…”