2006
DOI: 10.3386/w12574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Instrumental Variables in Models with Essential Heterogeneity

Abstract: provided helpful comments on various drafts. Supplementary material for this paper is available at the website http;//jenni.uchicago.edu/underiv. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
318
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(324 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
318
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the purpose of this study was to estimate the e¤ect of aggregated public health care expenditure, i.e. to estimate the average e¤ect, such heterogeneity might cause a problem when estimating the e¤ect with IV methods (Heckman et al, 2006). Here, the problem would arise if the marginal expenditure identi…ed by the instrumental variables were non-representative in terms of their e¤ect on absence.…”
Section: About Herementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the purpose of this study was to estimate the e¤ect of aggregated public health care expenditure, i.e. to estimate the average e¤ect, such heterogeneity might cause a problem when estimating the e¤ect with IV methods (Heckman et al, 2006). Here, the problem would arise if the marginal expenditure identi…ed by the instrumental variables were non-representative in terms of their e¤ect on absence.…”
Section: About Herementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of MTE was first introduced by Bjorklund and Moffitt (1987). Carneiro et al (2001), Heckman et al (2006), and Heckman and Vytlacil (2007) develop the theoretical framework of MTE estimation for the returns to schooling; derive the identification of the average treatment effect (ATE), treatment on the treated (TT), and treatment on the untreated (TUT); and also provide the empirical applications of these methods for U.S. data. Heckman and Li (2003) and Wang et al (2007) apply these methods to the estimation of the returns to education in China.…”
Section: Heterogeneous Returns To Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, such a model is referred to as "random coefficient" or "heterogeneous treatment effect" models (Heckman et al (2006)). There are two potential wage outcomes (for workers with and without higher education):…”
Section: Returns To Education: Model With Essential Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Borrowing the notation of Heckman, Urzua, and Vytlacil (2006) and Zhou and Xie (2016a), we propose a simple model for parental divorce that incorporates unobserved response heterogeneity. We define the effect of parental divorce on children's outcomes to be a function of both and , called the marginal treatment effect (MTE) 9 :…”
Section: Modeling Heterogeneous Effects Of Parental Divorce By Observmentioning
confidence: 99%