Understanding innovation platform effectiveness through experiences from west and central Africa

Abstract

Innovation platforms (IPs) are a way of organizing multistakeholder interactions, marshalling ideas, people and resources to address challenges and opportunities embedded in complex settings. The approach has its roots in theories of complexity, the concept of innovation systems and practices of participatory action research. IPs have been widely adopted across Africa and beyond in recent years as a "must have" tool in a range of "for development" modes of agricultural research. Our experiences with establishing and facilitating nine IPs in local settings in west and central Africa contribute to understanding factors that impact on their effectiveness. The nine IPs were variously focused on developing dairy, crop and/or meat value chains by strengthening mixed crop-livestock production systems or seed systems. Using case study methods, we identified variables that contribute to explaining the performance of these IPs in relation to six domains of change in the agricultural system and the sustainability of changes. Thematic analysis was guided by a conceptual framework which grouped variables into four categories (context, structure, conduct, and process) that interact to influence IP performance. Stronger market connections and value chains were generated through some of these IPs but the most prevalent changes overall were in farm productivity and technical knowledge of producers. The structures evolved in some IPs, akin to those of producer collectives, suggested they were filling an institutional gap locally. The effect of the IPs on deeper level institutions that influence agricultural systems and food security was modest, constraining prospects for the IPs to generate impact at scale. Impacts from the IPs on research and development organisations were uncommon but had transformative significance. Our conceptual framework did not offer optimal guidance to understanding how the many variables that contributed to performance of these IPs combined and sequenced, but the pattern of interactions was consistent with increased social capital being the prime mediator for change. Achieving greater prospects for transformational

Innovation Platforms in Agricultural Research for Development

“…as cooperative) for an innovation platform to enhance its sustainability in terms of independence, its (monetary and non-monetary) benefits for its members, and its potential to become eligible for donations or credit. A comparative case study paper by Davies et al (2018) providing examples of improved financial access for innovation platform members as a result of the innovation platform's negotiation with finance providers.…”

Innovative Development Management In Agribusiness

“…To manage innovative development and resolve existing problems of agribusiness scientific support, it is necessary to provide conditions for development of scientific and (or) scientific and technical results, as well as scientific results implementation in production, and their subsequent involvement in economic turnover. This includes innovative platforms development to interact and distribute ideas, people, and resources, in order to solve problems and realize opportunities under complicated conditions (Davies et al, 2018). An innovative platform can stimulate and provide a basis for many-sided cooperation in order to implement the concept of a climate-smart agriculture at the local level (Osorio-García et al, 2020).…”

Participative Innovation Platforms (PIP) for Upgrading NTFP Value Chains in East Africa

“…Moreover, the building of trust and social connectedness between the actor groups was found to strengthen the whole value chain. The effectiveness of innovation platforms is confirmed by agricultural innovation platforms, especially for longer periods (> 3 years) (Davies et al 2018). To facilitate social-learning based change, a regular repetition of the PIP is a recommended way forward to sustain the process of knowledge creation and "adaptive innovation management": Sparrow and Traoré (2018) found that the number of platform meetings was correlated with the functionality of the platform.…”