2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding inhibitory mechanisms of lumbar spinal manipulation using H-reflex and F-wave responses: A methodological approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…48,49 Moreover, ventral horn motor neuron excitability in the lumbar spine is reliably attenuated following SMT applied to the lumbar spine in human subjects. 21 Recent studies employing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have observed supra-spinal changes following manual therapy. The blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal associated with a painful pressure stimulus is reduced in several cortical regions following thoracic SMT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48,49 Moreover, ventral horn motor neuron excitability in the lumbar spine is reliably attenuated following SMT applied to the lumbar spine in human subjects. 21 Recent studies employing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have observed supra-spinal changes following manual therapy. The blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal associated with a painful pressure stimulus is reduced in several cortical regions following thoracic SMT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally spinal manipulation has been shown to decrease electromyography activity of the paraspinal muscles in individuals with increased muscle activity of the paraspinal muscle bundles [29]. Afferent input at the talocrural joint mechanoreceptor level could have conceivably affected corresponding efferent output to the gastrocnemius muscle, either through decreased excitability of spinal reflexes [30] or through the use of monoaminergic systems [16]. It is possible that our intervention used inhibitory mechanisms at the central nervous system level to decrease muscle stiffness, but the exact mechanisms (pre-synaptic inhibition, arthrogenic muscle inhibition, 1B inhibition, monoamineric drive, etc.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental evidence accumulated to date indicates that SM could have an impact on the afferent neurons from paraspinal tissues and directly influences muscle spindle afferents and Golgi tendon organs, which are directly involved in muscle tone regulation. 6,7,8,9,11,12 Previous studies conducted on stroke patients and CP children provided only descriptive information about such influence. 13,14,15 Muscle spasticity was the primary outcome measure of the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Decrease in motoneuron excitability (H-reflex) after sacroiliac joint manipulation was observed in patients with low back pain. 11,12 There are several clinical studies suggesting the influence of SM on spasticity. Decrease of spasticity after SM was noted in post-stroke patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%