2017
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding human queuing behaviour at exits: an empirical study

Abstract: The choice of the exit to egress from a facility plays a fundamental role in pedestrian modelling and simulation. Yet, empirical evidence for backing up simulation is scarce. In this contribution, we present three new groups of experiments that we conducted in different geometries. We varied parameters such as the width of the doors, the initial location and number of pedestrians which in turn affected their perception of the environment. We extracted and analysed relevant indicators such as distance to the ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the choice of exits in this direction also remains a great challenge, especially when dealing with complex environments (Zheng, Jia, Li, & Jiang, 2017; Zia & Ferscha, 2009). In most studies, the choice of exits is determined by several factors, including the distance from pedestrians to the exits, the width of exits, the degree of congestion, and the familiarity of pedestrians with the environment (Cao, Fu, & Song, 2018; Hao et al., 2014; Kinateder, Comunale, & Warren, 2018; Lo, Huang, Wang, Yuen, 2006; Wagoum et al., 2017). Such methods would usually design complex numerical operations for multi‐exit selection and have achieved remarkable results according to environmental conditions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the choice of exits in this direction also remains a great challenge, especially when dealing with complex environments (Zheng, Jia, Li, & Jiang, 2017; Zia & Ferscha, 2009). In most studies, the choice of exits is determined by several factors, including the distance from pedestrians to the exits, the width of exits, the degree of congestion, and the familiarity of pedestrians with the environment (Cao, Fu, & Song, 2018; Hao et al., 2014; Kinateder, Comunale, & Warren, 2018; Lo, Huang, Wang, Yuen, 2006; Wagoum et al., 2017). Such methods would usually design complex numerical operations for multi‐exit selection and have achieved remarkable results according to environmental conditions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the models designed from these studies are unable to accommodate pedestrian behaviors that are proven to be significant during the evacuation process (Bode & Codling, 2013). The second is focused on designing a multi‐exit selection model using realistic experimental simulation (Haghani, Sarvi, Ejtemai, Burd, & Sobhani, 2015; Heliövaara, Kuusinen, Rinne, Korhonen, & Ehtamo, 2012; Wagoum, Tordeux, & Liao, 2017). In contrast to the first category, the models designed using the second approach often incur high preliminary costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data in [40] refer to ten trials: 2 trials with 18 pedestrians, 6 trials with 40 pedestrians, and 2 trials with 138 pedestrians. In the experiments with 18 and 40 pedestrians (and so in the simulation as well), the group is initially positioned in a square located symmetrically with respect to the horizontal axis of the room and towards the back of the room with linearly increasing people density from the front to the back.…”
Section: Evacuation From a Room With Two Exitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They included the social psychology perspective by using questionnaires to obtain insights into participants’ perception. And other authors focused more on egress and queuing behaviour such as [ 32 ]. To our knowledge, [ 33 ] are the first authors who conducted an experiment with a stationary crowd and who tested the effects on walking participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%