2023
DOI: 10.1002/tea.21891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding how student‐constructed stop‐motion animations promote mechanistic reasoning: A theoretical framework and empirical evidence

Abstract: Previous studies have documented the promising results from student‐constructed representations, including stop‐motion animation (SMA), in supporting mechanistic reasoning (MR), which is considered an essential thinking skill in science education. Our current study presents theoretically and empirically how student‐constructed SMA contributes to promoting MR. As a theoretical perspective, we propose a framework hypothesizing the link between elements of MR and the construction nature of SMA, that is, chunking … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 61 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approaches used to simplify or circumvent MER often involve mechanisms that explain how structural differences or changes affect the relative stability of the entities involved. Research in chemistry education shows that novice students often struggle to build such connections but possess cognitive resources that can be leveraged to foster their MER abilities. , For example, student understanding can be strengthened by properly using educational resources such as tutorial videos and animations , that facilitate the unpacking of mechanistic relationships. Designing and engaging students in carefully scaffolded tasks that provide a stepwise structure to guide their thinking also support the development of MER. , It is also important to make more explicit to students the concepts we encapsulate, the associations we build, and the simplifications we make, as it opens spaces for students to practice and metacognitively reflect on their abilities to unpack the underlying mechanisms .…”
Section: Final Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approaches used to simplify or circumvent MER often involve mechanisms that explain how structural differences or changes affect the relative stability of the entities involved. Research in chemistry education shows that novice students often struggle to build such connections but possess cognitive resources that can be leveraged to foster their MER abilities. , For example, student understanding can be strengthened by properly using educational resources such as tutorial videos and animations , that facilitate the unpacking of mechanistic relationships. Designing and engaging students in carefully scaffolded tasks that provide a stepwise structure to guide their thinking also support the development of MER. , It is also important to make more explicit to students the concepts we encapsulate, the associations we build, and the simplifications we make, as it opens spaces for students to practice and metacognitively reflect on their abilities to unpack the underlying mechanisms .…”
Section: Final Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%