2017
DOI: 10.1080/08920753.2017.1373453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding How Policy Actors Improvise and Collaborate in the Great Barrier Reef

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simplistic institutional and scientific approaches to action have proven ineffective and disruptive for negotiating consensus and compromise in the past [67]. Though there are also many examples in which consensus and compromise have been negotiated within the GBR [Vella and Baresi, 2017], the complexity and uncertainty associated with assisted ecosystem adaptation further adds to the challenge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simplistic institutional and scientific approaches to action have proven ineffective and disruptive for negotiating consensus and compromise in the past [67]. Though there are also many examples in which consensus and compromise have been negotiated within the GBR [Vella and Baresi, 2017], the complexity and uncertainty associated with assisted ecosystem adaptation further adds to the challenge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, structuring public and stakeholder engagement in decision-making over such a large area and in context of a highly complex socially institutional and regulatory environment is also technically challenging due to the diverse range of parties and rights holders who have PLOS ONE interests at stake. Experiences involving policy-makers in science and community and multistakeholder parties together in dialogic spaces in the GBR [80] are a starting point that can be built upon. Further research into frameworks for supporting diversified involvement might usefully focus on maximizing the effectiveness of adaptive restoration initiatives and minimizing the chances that decisions are made unilaterally by groups of highly skilled but unrepresentative individuals and organizations.…”
Section: Social Challenges and Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%