2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.687859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Heterosis, Genetic Effects, and Genome Wide Associations for Forage Quantity and Quality Traits in Multi-Cut Pearl Millet

Abstract: Pearl millet is an important food and fodder crop cultivated in the arid and semi-arid regions of Africa and Asia, and is now expanding to other regions for forage purpose. This study was conducted to better understand the forage quantity and quality traits to enhance the feed value of this crop. Two sets of pearl millet hybrids (80 single cross hybrids in Set-I and 50 top cross hybrids in Set-II) along with their parents evaluated multi-locationally for the forage-linked traits under multi-cut (two cuts) syst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the high-quality forage demand, breeding efforts have been directed to breed exclusively for high nutritive forage pearl millet inbreds, hybrids and open pollinated varieties (OPVs) (Gupta et al 2015;Ponnaiah et al 2019;Govintharaj et al 2018Govintharaj et al , 2021. Earlier, two popular dual-purpose varieties of pearl millet were developed by introgressing the bmr trait to improve forage quality (Yadav & Weltzein 1998;Blümmel et al 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the high-quality forage demand, breeding efforts have been directed to breed exclusively for high nutritive forage pearl millet inbreds, hybrids and open pollinated varieties (OPVs) (Gupta et al 2015;Ponnaiah et al 2019;Govintharaj et al 2018Govintharaj et al , 2021. Earlier, two popular dual-purpose varieties of pearl millet were developed by introgressing the bmr trait to improve forage quality (Yadav & Weltzein 1998;Blümmel et al 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%