Understanding Health Care Administrators’ Data and Information Needs for Decision Making during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study at an Academic Health System

Abstract

Objective. The COVID-19 pandemic created an unprecedented strain on the health care system, and administrators had to make many critical decisions to respond appropriately. This study sought to understand how health care administrators used data and information for decision making during the first 6 mo of the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods. We conducted semistructured interviews with administrators across University of Florida (UF) Health. We performed an inductive thematic analysis of the transcripts. Results. Four themes emerged from the interviews: 1) common types of health systems or hospital operations data; 2) public health and other external data sources; 3) data interaction, integration, and exchange; and 4) novelty and evolution in data, information, or tools used over time. Participants illustrated the organizational, public health, and regional information they considered essential (e.g., hospital census, community positivity rate, etc.). Participants named specific challenges they faced due to data quality and timeliness. Participants elaborated on the necessity of data integration, validation, and coordination across different boundaries (e.g., different hospital systems in the same metro areas, public health agencies at the local, state, and federal level, etc.). Participants indicated that even within the first 6 mo of the COVID-19 pandemic, the data and tools used for making critical decisions changed. Discussion. While existing medical informatics infrastructure can facilitate decision making in pandemic response, data may not always be readily available in a usable format. Interoperable infrastructure and data standardization across multiple health systems would help provide more reliable and timely information for decision making. Conclusion. Our findings contribute to future discussions of improving data infrastructure and developing harmonized data standards needed to facilitate critical decisions at multiple health care system levels. Highlights The study revealed common health systems or hospital operations data and information used in decision making during the first 6 mo of the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants described commonly used internal data sources, such as resource and financial reports and dashboards, and external data sources, such as federal, state, and local public health data. Participants described challenges including poor timeliness and limited local relevance of external data as well as poor integration of data sources within and across organizational boundaries. Results suggest the need for continued integration and standardization of health data to support health care administrative decision making during pandemics or other emergencies.

Information systems as a source of meaningful information in an epidemic: experience and lessons in restoring routine otorhinolaryngology care after the COVID-19 pandemic

“…д.) пациента [7,[23][24][25][26][27]; ■ обеспечение готовности к оказанию медицинской помощи персонала медицинской организации [1][2][3][4][5][28][29][30][31]; ■ моделирование оказания медицинской помощи, проверка и выбор оптимального варианта организации и распределения нагрузки [6,9,[32][33][34][35][36].…”

“It's Not a Sprint, It's a Marathon”: Stages of Managing a Nursing Home Throughout the Pandemic

“… 14 Availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) and timely testing was difficult, 15 , 16 although improvement in their availability improved over time. 17 Infection control surveys occurred with increased frequency, 18 and rapidly changing, inconsistent policies from local, state, and federal institutions required quick implementation. 19 , 20 , 21 Negative media attention compounded this sense of fear and confusion.…”