2016
DOI: 10.1177/0266666916657582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding G2G e-government project impasse

Abstract: A number of studies have examined the failures of e-government efforts from various theoretical perspectives in the domains of government-to-citizen (G2C) and government-to-business (G2B). However, only a few studies have been done in government-to-government (G2G) e-government projects. This paper examines the impasse reached during the implementation of a statewide Digital Secretariat Project in India through the lens of stakeholder theory. A qualitative case study approach employing semi-structured intervie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data include a pre-liberalisation period (1980s) and a post-liberalisation period (1990s and 2000s), which makes it possible to test for income convergence in the long run, and to capture the effect of reforms (macro and structural reforms in the 1990s for all states in India and implementation of the LEP in the 2000s for the states in the NER) through structural breaks in our income convergence tests (see, Chatterji and Choudhury 2013). Additionally, long time-series increases the statistical power of the tests employed in this paper to account for structural breaks, making the results more robust and reliable (Choudhury and Hawes 2014 their interface Glückler 2003, 2011;Pandey and Gupta 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Our data include a pre-liberalisation period (1980s) and a post-liberalisation period (1990s and 2000s), which makes it possible to test for income convergence in the long run, and to capture the effect of reforms (macro and structural reforms in the 1990s for all states in India and implementation of the LEP in the 2000s for the states in the NER) through structural breaks in our income convergence tests (see, Chatterji and Choudhury 2013). Additionally, long time-series increases the statistical power of the tests employed in this paper to account for structural breaks, making the results more robust and reliable (Choudhury and Hawes 2014 their interface Glückler 2003, 2011;Pandey and Gupta 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This theory has been widely applied to identify key stakeholders affecting the implementation and development of ICT projects, particularly in e-government, such as the research of Axelsson et al (2013), Pandey and Gupta (2017), and Sæbø et al (2011). All these studies attempt to find out who involve and how their salience is in implementing e-projects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stakeholders are able to generate more stable decision which integrates longterm and short-term strategy perspectives (Bottenberg et al, 2016). In several cases, higher government intervention is very important to give important meaning to executive institutions and avoid other dominant stakeholders with potential to slow down a project (Pandey & Gupta, 2016). Every process of stakeholder involvement must be evaluated through simple assessment methodology and in a wider context stakeholders' involvement activities must be assessed (Tomkiv et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%