2001
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.18.000717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding fast Hankel transforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the seminal work by Siegman in 1977, 1 a number of algorithms for the numerical evaluation of the HT have been reported in the literature, for both zero-order HTs [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] and high-order HTs. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Unfortunately, the performance of a method for computing the HT is highly dependent on the function to be transformed, and thus it is difficult to determine the optimal algorithm for a given function. In optics, we often deal with problems where the HT and the IHT need to be computed thousands of times starting from a known analytical expression for the input function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the seminal work by Siegman in 1977, 1 a number of algorithms for the numerical evaluation of the HT have been reported in the literature, for both zero-order HTs [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] and high-order HTs. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Unfortunately, the performance of a method for computing the HT is highly dependent on the function to be transformed, and thus it is difficult to determine the optimal algorithm for a given function. In optics, we often deal with problems where the HT and the IHT need to be computed thousands of times starting from a known analytical expression for the input function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the most general case the heating function H(r,z), and hence initial pressure p 0 (r,z)ϭ⌫H(r,z), will be given as values on a grid. In this case numerical Fourier and Hankel transforms 25,26 may be used to calculate p 0 (k r ,) from Eqs. ͑35͒ and ͑36͒.…”
Section: A Cylindrically Symmetric Heating Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical evaluations of (1.2) and (1.3) are rare and their numerical computations are difficult because of the oscillatory behavior of the Bessel function and the infinite length of the interval. Since seminal work by Siegman [19] in 1977, a number of algorithms for the numerical evaluation of the Hankel transform have been published for both zero-order [5,6,[9][10][11][12][20][21][22][23][24] and high-order [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Hankel transform. Unfortunately, the efficiency of a method for computing Hankel transform is highly dependent on the function to be transformed, and thus it is difficult to choose the optimal algorithm for given function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%