2014
DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2014.11077046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Expectations of Different User Groups of a Sophisticated Fall Detection System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This isn't the first instance where Q‐methodology has been used in HFE. Koloszár (2014), for example, used Q‐methodology to identify different participant group's responses to a fall detection system for the elderly. However, Koloszár (2014) never reflected on the value of Q‐methodology for understanding HFE problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This isn't the first instance where Q‐methodology has been used in HFE. Koloszár (2014), for example, used Q‐methodology to identify different participant group's responses to a fall detection system for the elderly. However, Koloszár (2014) never reflected on the value of Q‐methodology for understanding HFE problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Koloszár (2014), for example, used Q‐methodology to identify different participant group's responses to a fall detection system for the elderly. However, Koloszár (2014) never reflected on the value of Q‐methodology for understanding HFE problems. Based on the findings of this study it is recommended that Q‐methodology be considered as part of a suite of tools available to HFE to investigate topics where the subject‐area is sensitive or where participants have difficulty explaining their feelings and attitudes towards the complex subject‐area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations