2007
DOI: 10.1097/mnh.0b013e328057de8b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding estimated glomerular filtration rate: implications for identifying chronic kidney disease

Abstract: As a screening test, SCr should be interpreted as a marker of CKD probability in the context of the patient's clinical presentation. Measured GFR or creatinine clearance may be helpful in high-risk patients with normal SCr levels. GFR estimating equations should be reserved for patients with identified CKD. Standardized SCr and cystatin C assays are needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this technique has some limitations such as being affected by muscle mass, age, and gender, and is most sensitive when renal injury is advanced and the patient glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is relatively poor (19). In comparison, when GFR is near normal, renal function can be measured with greater accuracy and sensitivity in diabetic patients using cystatin-C (20).…”
Section: Diabetic Nephropathy Standard Biomarkers Used For the Diagnomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this technique has some limitations such as being affected by muscle mass, age, and gender, and is most sensitive when renal injury is advanced and the patient glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is relatively poor (19). In comparison, when GFR is near normal, renal function can be measured with greater accuracy and sensitivity in diabetic patients using cystatin-C (20).…”
Section: Diabetic Nephropathy Standard Biomarkers Used For the Diagnomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precision of the estimating equations was expressed as root mean square error, and accuracy was expressed as % estimating equation within 10% and 30% of iGFR. Residual plots were determined (15,16). Nonlinear regression analysis was used to characterize the relationship between serum creatinine levels and iGFR.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their competence to evaluate an early impairment of GFR is debatable (63). Furthermore, the standardization of SCr measurements becomes mandatory to avoid differences in the results of prediction formulas due to interlaboratory variability in the measurement of SCr (40,59,64,67). Finally, SCr-based prediction formulas should be validated in the different ethnic groups and in patients with different body composition, such as obese and malnourished patients (12,15,20,34,58,61).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%